Discovery Program Grant Guidelines
(2024 edition – Variation 1):
Discovery Indigenous
Opening date: | Available on GrantConnect |
Closing date and time: | Available on GrantConnect |
Commonwealth policy entity: | Australian Research Council |
Enquiries: | Researchers are required to direct requests for information to the Research Office within the Administering Organisation. ARC Contacts are on the ARC website. |
Date guidelines released: |
|
Type of grant opportunity: | Restricted competitive |
Australian Research Council Act 2001
I, Jason Clare, Minister for Education, having satisfied myself of the matters set out in section 58 of the Australian Research Council Act 2001, approve these grant guidelines under section 59 of that Act.
Dated 19 August 2025
Jason Clare
Minister for Education
Contents
1. Discovery Program processes.........................................3
2. About the Discovery Program.........................................4
About the Discovery Indigenous grant opportunity...........................4
3. Grant amount and grant period........................................4
4. Eligibility criteria....................................................5
5. What the grant money can be used for..................................8
What grants funds can be used for.......................................8
What grants funds cannot be used for.....................................9
6. The assessment criteria.............................................10
Assessing the DAATSIA candidate......................................11
7. How to apply.......................................................11
Application process..................................................11
National Interest Test Statement........................................12
Letter of Community Support...........................................12
Timing of the grant opportunity.........................................12
8. The grant selection process..........................................12
9. Successful grant applications........................................13
10. Probity............................................................16
Appendix A – Glossary......................................................18
Acronyms..........................................................18
Definitions.........................................................19
Appendix B: Eligible Organisations...........................................26
The Discovery Program supports the Australian Government’s objectives for research and innovation.
This grant program contributes to the ARC’s Outcome 1, which is to grow knowledge and innovation through managing research grants, measuring research excellence and providing advice.
The Discovery Indigenous scheme is funded within the Discovery Program.
The grant opportunity opens.
We (the ARC) publish the grant guidelines and advertise on GrantConnect
You (the Administering Organisation) complete and submit an application.
You will complete an application on the ARC’s Research Management System (RMS), addressing eligibility, the National Interest Test and the assessment criteria.
We manage the assessment of all applications.
We manage the assessment of applications against eligibility criteria and assessment criteria.
Your application may be assigned to Detailed Assessors to undertake in-depth assessments. You will have an opportunity to respond to any Detailed Assessors’ written comments through a rejoinder.
Selection Advisory Committee (SAC) members will then assess Your application, consider the Detailed Assessors’ ratings and comments and Your rejoinder and assign a final score.
We make grant recommendations.
The SAC considers applications and recommends those to be funded, and the level and duration of funding for each project, to the ARC Accountable Authority.
The ARC Accountable Authority then makes an assessment, considering the SAC’s advice, compliance with the eligibility criteria and grant application process, alignment with Australian Government priorities and any other due diligence matters. The ARC Accountable Authority may consider advice from other Commonwealth agencies and make its own independent enquiries.
Grant decisions are made.
The ARC Accountable Authority decides which applications are approved, and the level of funding and duration of funding for each approved project.
If the Minister decides the ARC Accountable Authority should not fund a project for reasons relevant to security, defence or international relations of Australia, the Minister must notify the ARC Accountable Authority, advise the Parliamentary Joint Committee on Intelligence and Security and take other steps required under the ARC Act.
We notify You of the outcome.
We advise You if Your application was successful or not through RMS.
We enter into a grant agreement with You.
We will enter into a grant agreement with You through RMS, if You are successful.
Delivery of the grant.
You undertake the grant activity and report to us as set out in Your grant agreement.
We manage the grant by monitoring Your progress and making payments.
Evaluation of the grant opportunity.
We evaluate the specific grant activity and the individual grant opportunity as a whole.
We will use information You provide to Us through Your reports to inform evaluations.
Category | Details |
Project funding | Between $30,000 and $500,000 per year, including: Minimum $30,000 per year Any DAATSIA salary requested |
Project funding duration | Up to five consecutive years |
DAATSIA salary | Requested and/or awarded at one of five salary levels as specified on the ‘Salaries and Stipends’ page of the ARC website. The DAATSIA salary is counted towards the $500,000 maximum level of funding per year |
DAATSIA salary duration | Up to five consecutive years on a full-time basis. A DAATSIA may be undertaken on a part-time basis not exceeding eight consecutive years |
then We may award the grant to Adelaide University.
a. research activities, infrastructure or projects previously funded or currently being funded through any other Commonwealth grant;
b. medical research as detailed in the ARC Medical Research Policy (2025 version) on the ARC website;
c. experimental development, as defined in the Glossary;
d. activities leading solely to the creation or performance of a work of art, including visual art, musical compositions, drama, dance, film, broadcasts, designs and literary works, unless those works are directly related to the project activities and demonstrably research based;
e. contracted research or consultancy arrangements where one or more Organisation(s) is seeking expert external assistance, not available within their own organisation, to develop specific applications or outputs that involve little innovation or are low risk;
f. production of computer programs, research aids and tools; data warehouses, catalogues or bibliographies; or teaching materials, unless these meet the definition of ‘research’;
g. basic facilities that must be provided (where relevant) and funded by You and are not funded by the grant:
h. capital works and general infrastructure costs;
i. costs not directly related to the project, including but not limited to professional membership fees, professional development courses, fees for patent application and maintenance, equipment for live music or drama performances, equipment for gallery and museum exhibitions, visas, relocation costs, entertainment costs, purchase of alcohol, insurance, mobile phones (purchase or call charges) and other indirect costs;
j. fees for international students or the Higher Education Contribution Scheme (HECS) and Higher Education Loan Program (HELP) liabilities for students;
k. salaries and/or on-costs, in whole or in part, for CIs or PIs; and
l. HDR stipends for CIs, DAATSIA recipients and PIs, in whole or in part.
Taking into account research opportunity,
- record of high-quality research outputs appropriate to the discipline(s)
- evidence of excellence in research training, mentoring and supervision (where appropriate); and
- the capability of the investigator or team to build collaborations both within Australia and internationally.
Describe the:
- contribution to an important gap in knowledge or significant problem;
- novelty/originality and innovation of the proposed research (including any new methods, technologies, theories or ideas that will be developed);
- clarity of the hypothesis, theories and research questions;
- cohesiveness of the project design and implementation plan (including the appropriateness of the aim, conceptual framework, method, data and/or analyses); and
- extent to which the research has the potential to enhance international collaboration.
If the project involves Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander research additional criteria include:
- the project’s level of collaboration, engagement, relationship building and benefit sharing with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples, and First Nations Organisations and Communities;
- the project’s strategy and mechanisms for Indigenous research capacity building within the project;
- the project’s level of internal leadership of Indigenous research;
- the project’s adherence to the Australian Indigenous Data Sovereignty Principles (2018); and
- the project’s understanding of, and proposed strategies to adhere to, the AIATSIS Code of Ethics for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Research (2020) and NHMRC’s guidelines on Ethical conduct in research with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples and communities (2018).
Describe the potential benefits including the:
- new or advanced knowledge resulting from outcomes of the research;
- economic, commercial, environmental, social and/or cultural benefits for Australia and international communities; and
- potential contribution to capacity in the Australian Government priority areas.
Describe the:
- cost-effectiveness of the research and its value for money;
- suitability of the environment for the research team and their project, and for HDR students where appropriate;
- availability of the necessary facilities to complete the project; and
- extent to which the project’s design, participants and requested budget create confidence in the timely and successful completion of the project.
a. potential to enhance and expedite a high-quality project;
b. location within a suitable research environment that will support the candidate and project;
c. record of high-quality research outputs appropriate to the discipline(s);
d. evidence of excellence in research training, mentoring and supervision (where appropriate); and
e. capability to build collaborations both within Australia and internationally.
a. how well it meets the weighted assessment criteria;
b. how it is ranked against other applications; and
c. whether it provides value for money (as defined in the Glossary).
a. Your name and any other parties involved in or associated with the project;
b. named participants and their organisations;
c. the project description (the title and summary descriptions);
d. Your National Interest Test statement;
e. classifications and international collaboration country names; and
f. the ARC grant funding amount.
a. name;
b. addresses;
c. nominated contact details; or
d. bank account details.
a. End of year reports;
b. Final reports; and
c. Post-project reporting.
a. You clearly identify the information as confidential and explain why We should treat it as confidential;
b. the information is commercial in confidence;
c. revealing the information would cause unreasonable harm to You or someone else; or
d. You provide the information with an understanding that it will stay confidential.
For the purposes of the Discovery Program grant guidelines, acronyms have the meanings defined below.
Acronym | Description |
ARC | Australian Research Council |
ARC Act | Australian Research Council Act 2001 |
CGRPs | Commonwealth Grants Rules and Principles 2024 |
CI | Chief Investigator |
DAATSIA | Discovery Australian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Award |
DECRA | Discovery Early Career Researcher Award |
FOI | Freedom of Information |
FTE | Full Time Equivalent |
GST | Goods and Services Tax |
HDR | Higher Degree by Research |
HECS | Higher Education Contribution Scheme |
HELP | Higher Education Loan Program |
KPI | Key Performance Indicator |
NCGP | National Competitive Grants Program |
ORCID | Open Researcher and Contributor Identifier |
PI | Partner Investigator |
RMS | Research Management System |
SAC | Selection Advisory Committee |
For the purposes of the Discovery Program grant guidelines, terms have the meanings defined below.
Term | Definition |
Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander person | a person of Australian Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander descent who identifies as an Australian Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander person and is accepted as an Australian Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander person by the community in which they live or have lived. |
Accountable Authority | Members of the ARC Board are the Accountable Authority of the ARC as defined in section 5 of the ARC Act. |
active project | a project that is receiving funding according to the terms of an existing Funding Agreement or grant agreement, or has any carryover funds approved by the ARC, or an approved variation to the project end date. |
active project assessment date | the date on which active project eligibility will be considered for project and application limits per named participant. |
Administering Organisation | an Eligible Organisation which submits an application for a grant and which will be responsible for the administration of the grant if the application is approved for funding. |
applicant | the Administering Organisation. |
application | a request for funding submitted through RMS by an Administering Organisation seeking grant funding under an ARC grant program. It includes the specifics of a proposed grant activity as well as the administrative information required to determine the eligibility of the application. |
applied research | original investigation undertaken in order to acquire new knowledge. It is, however, directed primarily towards a specific, practical aim or objective. https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/classifications/australian-and-new-zealand-standard-research-classification-anzsrc/latest-release |
ARC Board | The ARC Board is appointed by the Minister and consists of the Chair, Deputy Chair and up to seven other members. The ARC Board’s function includes determining priorities, strategies and policies from the ARC. The ARC Board is the Accountable Authority of the Australian Research Council. |
ARC College of Experts | the body of experts of international standing appointed to assist the ARC to identify research excellence, moderate external assessments and recommend applications for funding. Its members are specialist and generalist experts in their knowledge fields drawn from the Australian research community. The ARC website provides information on who is a member of the College of Experts. |
ARC Fellowship
| a named Fellowship position within any ARC grant program where the salary is funded wholly or partly by the ARC. |
assessment criteria
| the specified principles or standards, against which applications will be considered. These criteria are also used to assess the merits of applications and, in the case of a competitive grant opportunity, to determine application rankings. |
Australian Government priority areas | any areas identified by the Australian Government as priorities for research. |
bench fees | fees that an organisation charges for an individual to use infrastructure which would normally be provided by the organisation for their employees. This infrastructure may vary and could include, for example, an office or laboratory space with appropriate equipment, or access to non-specialised equipment owned by the organisation. |
candidate | the person nominated in an application for a Discovery Australian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Researcher Award. |
Chief Investigator | a participant who satisfies the eligibility criteria for a CI under these grant guidelines. |
consultancy | the provision of specialist advice, analysis, assistance, services or products to another organisation(s), generally where the consultancy services are for the sole or preferred use of that other organisation(s). |
date of effect | the date on which a grant agreement is signed or a specified starting date. |
Detailed Assessors | assessors drawn from the ARC assessor community who are assigned applications to review for their specific expertise in a field of research. |
eligibility criteria | the mandatory criteria which must be met to qualify for a grant. Assessment criteria may apply in addition to eligibility criteria. |
Eligible Organisation | an organisation listed in Appendix B of these grant guidelines. |
experimental development | experimental development is systematic work, drawing on knowledge gained from research and practical experience and producing additional knowledge, which is directed to producing new products or processes or to improving existing products or processes. https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/classifications/australian-and-new-zealand-standard-research-classification-anzsrc/latest-release |
field research | the collection of information integral to the project outside a laboratory, library or workplace setting and often in a location external to the participant’s normal place of employment. |
grant activity | the project/tasks/services that the grantee is required to undertake. A project consists of a number of grant activities. |
grant agreement | the agreement entered into by the ARC and an Administering Organisation when an application from that organisation is approved for grant funding. This was previously referred to as a ‘Funding Agreement’. |
grant commencement date | the date on which grant funding may commence. |
grant guidelines | grant guidelines, otherwise known as funding rules, are rules approved by the Minister under section 59 (including as varied under section 60) of the ARC Act. |
grant offer | the details listed in the ARC’s RMS under ‘Funding Offers’ showing the project details and grant amount. |
GrantConnect | the Australian Government’s whole-of-government grants information system, which centralises the publication and reporting of Commonwealth grants in accordance with the CGRPs. |
grantee | the Administering Organisation which has been selected to receive a grant. |
grant opportunity | the specific grant round or process where a Commonwealth grant is made available to potential grantees. Grant opportunities may be open or targeted and will reflect the relevant grant selection process. |
grant opportunity closing date | the last day on which applications for a grant opportunity will be accepted for consideration for a specific grant opportunity. |
grant recipient | an individual or organisation who has received grant funding from the ARC. |
GST | the meaning as given in Section 195-1 of the A New Tax System (Goods and Services Tax) Act 1999. |
Higher Degree by Research (HDR) | a ‘Research Doctorate or Research Masters course, for which at least two-thirds of the student load for the course is required as research work’ as defined by the Commonwealth Scholarships Guidelines (Research) 2017. |
Honorary academic appointment | an honorary academic appointment for eligibility purposes means a position that gives full academic status to the researcher, as certified by the Deputy Vice-Chancellor (Research) (or equivalent) in the application. The researcher must have access to research support comparable to employees e.g., an emeritus appointment. The researcher is not eligible to be a Chief Investigator using their honorary academic appointment if they are employed by an organisation other than an Eligible Organisation for more than 0.2 FTE. |
in-kind contributions | a contribution of goods, services, materials and/or time to the project from an individual, business or organisation. Values should be calculated based on the most likely actual cost, for example, current market, preferred provider or internal provider rates/valuations/rentals/charges (that is in the financial year of the date of the application) of the costs of labour, workspaces, equipment and databases. The calculations covering time and costs should be documented by the Administering Organisation. The ARC may require these calculations to be audited. |
Instructions to Applicants | a set of instructions prepared by the ARC to assist applicants in completing the application form. |
Key Performance Indicators | a set of quantifiable measures that the ARC uses to monitor and report on progress of research outcomes. |
legislative instrument | a law on matters of detail made by a person or body authorised to do so by the relevant enabling legislation. |
medical research | medical research as defined in the ARC Medical Research Policy (2025 version) available on the ARC website. |
named participants | individual researchers nominated for particular roles in an application. |
ORCID Identifier | a persistent digital identifier for an individual researcher available on the ORCID website, www.orcid.org. |
Other Eligible Organisation | an organisation listed in Section 4 of these grant guidelines which is not the Administering Organisation on an application. |
Other Organisation | an organisation that is not an Administering Organisation or Other Eligible Organisation that contributes to the research project. |
participants | all named participants on an application (i.e.. CIs, PIs, candidates); and all unnamed researchers such as postdoctoral research associates and postgraduate researchers working on a project. |
participating organisation | an organisation on an application (i.e., Administering Organisation, Other Eligible Organisations and Other Organisations) |
Partner Investigator | a named participant who satisfies the eligibility criteria for a Partner Investigator under these grant guidelines. |
Postdoctoral Research Associate | a postdoctoral research associate funded by the Commonwealth through the Administering Organisation, who will be employed on the project. |
Postgraduate Researcher | a postgraduate research student funded by the Commonwealth through the Administering Organisation, who will undertake a HDR through the project. |
Preprint or comparable resource | a preprint or comparable resource is a scholarly output that is uploaded by the authors to a recognised publicly accessible archive, repository, or pre-print service (such as, but not limited to, arXiv, bioRxiv, medRxiv, ChemRxiv, Peer J Preprints, Zenodo, GitHub, PsyArXiv and publicly available university or government repositories etc.). This will include a range of materials that have been subjected to varying degrees of peer review from none to light and full review. Ideally, a preprint or comparable resource should have a unique identifier or a DOI (digital object identifier). Any citation of a preprint or comparable resource should be explicitly identified as such and listed in the references with a DOI, URL or equivalent, version number and/or date of access, as applicable. |
project | an application approved by the ARC Accountable Authority to receive funding from the ARC through an application. |
project activity period | the period during which a project is receiving grant funding according to the original grant offer, or has any carryover funds approved by the ARC, or an approved variation to the project’s end date. During this period, the project is known as an active project. |
project end date | the expected date that the project activity is completed and by which all grant funding will be spent. |
Project Leader | the named participant from the Administering Organisation who is the first-named CI on an application. |
pure basic research | basic research carried out for the advancement of knowledge, without seeking long-term economic or social benefits or making any effort to apply the results to practical problems or to transfer the results to sectors responsible for their application. https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/classifications/australian-and-new-zealand-standard-research-classification-anzsrc/latest-release |
research | for the purposes of these grant guidelines, the creation of new knowledge and/or the use of existing knowledge in a new and creative way so as to generate new concepts, methodologies, inventions and understandings. This could include synthesis and analysis of previous research to the extent that it is new and creative. This definition of research is consistent with a broad notion of research and experimental development comprising “creative and systematic work undertaken in order to increase the stock of knowledge – including knowledge of humankind, culture and society – and to devise new applications of available knowledge” |
research infrastructure | the assets, facilities, services, and coordinated access to major national and/or international research facilities or consortia which directly support research in higher education organisations and more broadly and which maintain the capacity of researchers to undertake excellent research and deliver innovative outcomes. |
Research Office | a business unit within an Eligible Organisation that is responsible for contact with the ARC regarding applications and projects. |
research output | all products (including Preprints or comparable resources) of a research project that meet the definition of research. |
Selection Advisory Committee (SAC) | a group of experts from academia and industry appointed to assist the ARC to evaluate applications and to provide a recommendation for funding to the ARC Accountable Authority. A SAC may be drawn from the ARC College of Experts. |
selection process | the method used to select potential grantees. This process may involve comparative assessment of applications or the assessment of applications against the eligibility criteria and/or the assessment criteria. |
Special Condition | a condition specified in a grant offer which governs the use of the funding provided by the ARC. |
strategic basic research | experimental and theoretical work undertaken to acquire new knowledge directed into specified broad areas in the expectation of practical discoveries. It provides the broad base of knowledge necessary for the solution of recognised practical problems. https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/classifications/australian-and-new-zealand-standard-research-classification-anzsrc/latest-release |
travel costs | the domestic and international economy travel costs associated with the project, including to foster and strengthen collaborations between researchers in Australia and overseas. |
value for money | ‘value for money’ is a judgement based on the grant application representing an efficient, effective, economical and ethical use of public resources determined from a variety of considerations: merit of the proposal, risk, cost and expected contribution to outcome achievement. |
Variation of Grant Agreement (Variation) | a request submitted to the ARC in RMS to agree a change in the grant agreement. |
We | the Australian Research Council (ARC). ‘Us’ and ‘Our’ are also used in this context. |
You | the Eligible Organisation that submitted the application. ‘Your’ is also used in this context. |
Organisation Name | Organisation ABN |
| Organisation Name | Organisation ABN |
Adelaide University | 41 202 953 738 |
| Swinburne University of Technology | 13 628 586 699 |
Australian Catholic University | 15 050 192 660 |
| ||
Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies | 62 020 533 641 |
| The Australian National University | 52 234 063 906 |
Avondale University | 53 108 186 401 |
| The University of Adelaide | 61 249 878 937 |
Batchelor Institute of Indigenous Tertiary Education | 32 039 179 166 |
| The University of Melbourne | 84 002 705 224 |
Bond University | 88 010 694 121 |
| The University of New England | 75 792 454 315 |
Central Queensland University | 39 181 103 288 |
| The University of New South Wales | 57 195 873 179 |
Charles Darwin University | 54 093 513 649 |
| The University of Newcastle | 15 736 576 735 |
Charles Sturt University | 83 878 708 551 |
| The University of Notre Dame Australia | 69 330 643 210 |
Curtin University | 99 143 842 569 |
| The University of Queensland | 63 942 912 684 |
Deakin University | 56 721 584 203 |
| The University of Sydney | 15 211 513 464 |
Edith Cowan University | 54 361 485 361 |
| The University of Western Australia | 37 882 817 280 |
Federation University Australia | 51 818 692 256 |
| Torrens University Australia | 99 154 937 005 |
Flinders University | 65 542 596 200 |
| University of Canberra | 81 633 873 422 |
Griffith University | 78 106 094 461 |
| University of Divinity | 95 290 912 141 |
James Cook University | 46 253 211 955 |
| University of South Australia | 37 191 313 308 |
La Trobe University | 64 804 735 113 |
| University of Southern Queensland | 40 234 732 081 |
Macquarie University | 90 952 801 237 |
| University of Tasmania | 30 764 374 782 |
Monash University | 12 377 614 012 |
| University of Technology Sydney | 77 257 686 961 |
Murdoch University | 61 616 369 313 |
| University of the Sunshine Coast | 28 441 859 157 |
Queensland University of Technology | 83 791 724 622 |
| University of Wollongong | 61 060 567 686 |
Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology | 49 781 030 034 |
| Victoria University | 83 776 954 731 |
Southern Cross University | 41 995 651 524 |
| Western Sydney University | 53 014 069 881 |