Linkage Program Grant Guidelines
(2024 edition – Variation 1):
Linkage Projects
Opening date: | Available on GrantConnect |
Closing date and time: | Available on GrantConnect |
Commonwealth policy entity: | Australian Research Council |
Enquiries: | Questions during the application period should be directed to the Administering Organisation’s Research Office. Answers to Frequently Asked Questions will be posted on GrantConnect. ARC Contacts are on the ARC website. |
Date guidelines released: |
|
Type of grant opportunity: | Restricted competitive |
Australian Research Council Act 2001
I, Jason Clare, Minister for Education, having satisfied myself of the matters set out in section 58 of the Australian Research Council Act 2001, approve these grant guidelines under section 59 of that Act.
Dated 19 August 2025
Jason Clare
Minister for Education
1. Linkage Program: Linkage Projects processes...........................3
2. About the grant program..............................................5
3. Grant amount and grant period........................................5
4. Eligibility criteria....................................................5
5. What the grant money can be used for..................................9
What grant funds can be used for........................................9
What grant funds cannot be used for......................................9
6. The assessment criteria.............................................10
7. How to apply.......................................................11
Application process..................................................11
National Interest Test Statement........................................11
Timing of the grant opportunities........................................11
8. The grant selection process..........................................12
Eligibility and assessment.............................................12
Who will approve grants...............................................12
Requests not to assess process........................................12
Rejoinder process...................................................13
9. Successful grant applications........................................13
Advice and Announcement............................................13
Grant Agreements...................................................13
Responsibilities.....................................................14
Specific research policies and practices..................................14
Monitoring and reporting..............................................15
10. Probity............................................................15
Appeals process.....................................................15
Conflict of interest....................................................16
Privacy and protection of personal information.............................16
Confidential information...............................................16
Freedom of information...............................................16
Appendix A: Glossary.......................................................17
Appendix B: Eligible Organisations...........................................24
The Linkage Program supports the Australian Government’s objectives for research and innovation.
This grant program contributes to the ARC’s Outcome 1, which is to grow knowledge and innovation through managing research grants, measuring research excellence and providing advice.
Linkage Projects is funded within the Linkage Program.
The grant opportunity opens.
We (the ARC) publish the grant guidelines and advertise on GrantConnect.
You (the Administering Organisation) complete and submit an application.
You work with Partner Organisations to complete an application on the ARC’s Research Management System (RMS), addressing eligibility and the assessment criteria.
We manage the assessment of all applications.
We manage the assessment of applications against eligibility criteria and assessment criteria.
Your application may be assigned to Detailed Assessors to undertake in-depth assessments. You will have an opportunity to respond to any Detailed Assessors’ written comments through a rejoinder.
Selection Advisory Committee (SAC) members will then assess Your application, consider the Detailed Assessors’ ratings and comments and Your rejoinder and assign a final score.
We make grant recommendations.
The SAC considers applications and recommends those to be funded, and the level and duration of funding for each project, to the ARC Accountable Authority.
The ARC Accountable Authority then makes an assessment, considering the SAC’s advice, compliance with the eligibility criteria and grant application process, alignment with Australian Government priorities and any other due diligence matters. The ARC Accountable Authority may consider advice from other Commonwealth agencies and make its own independent enquiries.
Grant decisions are made.
The ARC Accountable Authority decides which applications are approved, and the level of funding and duration of funding for each approved project.
If the Minister decides the ARC Accountable Authority should not fund a project for reasons relevant to security, defence or international relations of Australia, the Minister must notify the ARC Accountable Authority, advise the Parliamentary Joint Committee on Intelligence and Security and take any other steps required under the ARC Act.
We notify You of the outcome.
We advise You if Your application was successful or not through RMS.
We enter into a grant agreement with You.
We enter into a grant agreement with You through RMS, if You are successful.
Delivery of the grant.
You undertake the grant activity and report to Us as set out in Your grant agreement.
We manage the grant, monitor Your progress and make payments.
Evaluation of the grant opportunity.
We evaluate the specific grant activity and the grant opportunity as a whole.
We will use information You provide to Us through Your reports to inform evaluations.
a. support internationally competitive research projects and teams on challenges or opportunities of relevance to research end-users;
b. foster the establishment and strengthening of research alliances between higher education organisations and research end-users;
c. enhance the scale and focus of research, including in Australian Government priority areas.
a. new or strengthened collaborations and research alliances between universities and research end-users;
b. new knowledge that is of benefit to Australian research end-users, including in Australian Government priority areas; and
c. economic, commercial, environmental, social and/or cultural benefits for Australia.
Category | Details |
Linkage Projects funding level | Between $50,000 and $300,000 per year. |
Linkage Projects funding duration | Between two and five consecutive years. |
then We may award the grant to Adelaide University.
a. include at least one Partner Organisation;
b. nominate at least one Chief Investigator (CI);
c. include a commitment from Partner Organisation(s) to provide total eligible cash and/or in-kind contributions that at least match the total funding requested from Us; and
d. include a commitment from Partner Organisation(s) to provide total eligible cash contributions of at least 25% of the total funding requested from Us. If all Your Partner Organisations are Exempt Partner Organisations[1], You are not required to meet the 25% minimum eligible cash contribution requirement.
a. participate in the project for the project activity period unless otherwise approved by Us;
b. make a contribution of cash and/or in-kind and/or other material resources that is specific to the project, and having regard to the total cost of the project and not be part of a broader contribution to Your organisation or an Other Eligible Organisation; and
c. provide a Letter of Partner Organisation Certification, using the proforma provided on GrantConnect.
a. included on the National Redress Scheme’s website on the list of ‘Institutions that have not joined or signified their intent to join the Scheme’ (www.nationalredress.gov.au);
b. an Eligible Organisation;
c. a controlled entity of any Eligible Organisation; or
d. an entity (for example a joint venture) where more than 50% is owned by one or more Eligible Organisations.
a. be sourced from funds awarded or appropriated by the Commonwealth or an Australian State or Territory Government for the purposes of research, nor from funds previously used to leverage government research or research infrastructure funding; or
b. be a contribution to salaries for CIs and/or PIs on the application.
a. Chief Investigators (CIs); and
b. Partner Investigators (PIs).
a. who meet the eligibility criteria to be a CI, must be a CI and cannot opt to be a PI;
b. who do not meet the eligibility criteria to be a CI, must be a PI.
a. be an employee for at least 0.2 FTE at an Eligible Organisation; or
b. be a holder of an honorary academic appointment (as defined in the Glossary) at an Eligible Organisation.
a. include CIs on Linkage Projects, Industrial Transformation Research Program and ARC Centres of Excellence;
b. include Directors on Industrial Transformation Research Program, Special Research Initiatives and ARC Centres of Excellence;
c. do not include CIs on LIEF, Special Research Initiatives, LASP or Supporting Responses to Commonwealth Science Council Priorities; and
d. do not include Fellows under the Industry Fellowships Program.
a. Linkage Program projects that the named participant will hold as a CI or Director on active projects as at the active project assessment date; and
b. Linkage Projects applications We are currently assessing which include that participant as a CI.
a. salary support for other personnel, for example, research associates and assistants, technicians and laboratory attendants at an appropriate salary level, including 30% on-costs, at the employing organisation;
b. stipends for HDR students, at an appropriate level for the Administering Organisation or the relevant sector;
c. teaching relief for CIs up to a total of $50,000 per CI per year;
d. equipment (and its maintenance) and consumables, including specialised computer equipment and software essential to the project;
e. travel costs essential to the project, including economy travel costs for domestic and/or international travel and accommodation, not exceeding an average of $20,000 per year of the project. The following travel costs are not counted towards the average of $20,000 per year limit:
a. research activities, infrastructure or projects previously funded or currently being funded through any other Commonwealth grant;
b. medical research as detailed in the ARC Medical Research Policy (2025 version) on the ARC website;
c. experimental development, as defined in the Glossary;
d. activities leading solely to the creation or performance of a work of art, including visual art, musical compositions, drama, dance, film, broadcasts, designs and literary works, unless those works are directly related to the project activities and demonstrably research based;
e. contracted research or consultancy arrangements where one or more Organisation(s) is seeking expert external assistance, not available within their own organisation, in order to develop specific applications or outputs that involve little innovation or are low risk;
f. production of computer programs, research aids and tools; data warehouses, catalogues or bibliographies; or teaching materials, unless these meet the definition of ‘research’;
g. basic facilities, including:
h. capital works and general infrastructure costs;
i. costs not directly related to the project, including but not limited to professional membership fees, professional development courses, fees for patent application and maintenance, equipment for live music or drama performances, equipment for gallery and museum exhibitions, visas, relocation costs, entertainment costs, purchase of alcohol, insurance, mobile phones (purchase or call charges) and other indirect costs;
j. fees for international students or the Higher Education Contribution Scheme (HECS) and Higher Education Loan Program (HELP) liabilities for students; and
k. salaries and/or on-costs, in whole or in part, for CIs or PIs.
a. Project quality and innovation 30%
significance and innovativeness of the research in the context of previous research in the area;
robustness and appropriateness of the conceptual framework, design, methods and analyses;
the adequacy and appropriateness of the budget, including cash and in-kind contributions pledged by the participating organisations, and value for money considerations.
If the project involves Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander research, additional criteria include:
the project’s level of collaboration, engagement, relationship building and benefit sharing with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples, and First Nations Organisations and Communities;
the project’s strategy and mechanisms for Indigenous research capacity building within the project;
the project’s level of internal leadership of Indigenous research;
The project’s adherence to the Australian Indigenous Data Sovereignty Principles (2018); and
the project’s understanding of, and proposed strategies to adhere to, the AIATSIS Code of Ethics for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Research (2020) and NHMRC’s guidelines on Ethical conduct in research with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples and communities (2018).
b. Impact 20%
demonstration of the mutual benefit for participating organisations now and into the future;
evidence of how the research will advance/address Partner Organisation(s)’s core strategy;
potential contribution to Australian Government priority areas;
potential economic, commercial, environmental, social and/or cultural benefits for Australia; and
appropriateness of strategies for adoption, commercialisation, promotion, and/or dissemination of research outcomes, including IP management arrangements.
c. Investigator(s’) capability and quality of team 20%
quality of the named participant(s)’ skills and experience, relative to opportunity, including evidence of potential to engage in collaborative research;
experience in research training, mentoring and supervision;
capability and capacity of the team to undertake and manage the project; and
evidence of previous history of successful collaboration between the named participant(s) and this or other Partner Organisation(s).
d. Strength of the proposed research alliance 30%
extent and nature of commitment to the project, including provision of research environment, facilities and personnel (where relevant), relative to the scale of the project and the capacity of the participating organisations;
extent and appropriateness of proposed governance, structures and processes to support the project;
capacity and intent of Partner Organisations to use the outcomes of the research; and
potential of partnership to lead to long-term collaborations.
a. how well it meets the weighted assessment criteria;
b. how it is ranked against other applications; and
c. whether it provides value for money (as defined in the Glossary).
a. will give You a copy of the ARC’s Accountable Authority’s approval no more than 21 days after the ARC’s Accountable Authority’s decision;
b. may give You earlier notice of the ARC Accountable Authority’s approval and may impose a short embargo on announcements in order to enable parties to co-ordinate announcements; and
c. will list Your grant on GrantConnect no more than 21 calendar days after the date of effect.
a. Your name and any other parties involved in or associated with the project;
b. named participants and their organisations;
c. the project description (the title and summary descriptions);
d. Your National Interest Test statement;
e. classifications and international collaboration country names; and
f. the ARC grant funding amount.
a. take responsibility for the authorship and intellectual content of the application, appropriately citing sources and acknowledging all significant contributions, including from third parties; and
b. meet residential requirements specified in the grant agreement.
a. take significant intellectual responsibility for the planning and conduct of the project and for any strategic decisions required in its pursuit and the communication of results; and
b. have the relevant skills and experience to contribute to the project.
a. name;
b. addresses;
c. nominated contact details; or
d. bank account details.
a. End of year reports;
b. Final reports; and
c. Post-project reporting.
a. You clearly identify the information as confidential and explain why We should treat it as confidential;
b. the information is commercial in confidence;
c. revealing the information would cause unreasonable harm to You or someone else; or
d. You provide the information with an understanding that it will stay confidential.
Acronym | Description |
| Acronym | Description |
ARC | Australian Research Council |
| HECS | Higher Education Contribution Scheme |
ARC Act | Australian Research Council Act 2001 |
| HELP | Higher Education Loan Program |
CGRPs | Commonwealth Grants Rules and Principles 2024 |
| NCGP | National Competitive Grants Program |
CI | Chief Investigator |
| LASP | Learned Academies Special Projects |
FTE | Full Time Equivalent |
| LIEF | Linkage Infrastructure, Equipment and Facilities |
FOI | Freedom of Information |
| PI | Partner Investigator |
GST | Goods and Services Tax |
| RMS | Research Management System |
HDR | Higher Degree by Research |
| SAC | Selection Advisory Committee |
Term | Definition |
Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander person | a person of Australian Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander descent who identifies as an Australian Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander person and is accepted as an Australian Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander person by the community in which they live or have lived. |
Accountable Authority | Members of the ARC Board are the Accountable Authority of the ARC as defined in section 5 of the ARC Act. |
active project | a project that is receiving funding according to the terms of an existing Funding Agreement or grant agreement, or has any carryover funds approved by the ARC, or an approved variation to the project end date. |
active project assessment date | the date on which active project eligibility will be considered for project and application limits per named participant. |
Administering Organisation | an Eligible Organisation which submits an application for a grant and which will be responsible for the administration of the grant if the application is approved for funding. |
applicant | the Administering Organisation. |
application | a request for funding submitted through RMS by an Administering Organisation seeking grant funding under an ARC grant program. It includes the specifics of a proposed grant activity as well as the administrative information required to determine the eligibility of the application. |
applied research | original investigation undertaken in order to acquire new knowledge. It is, however, directed primarily towards a specific, practical aim or objective. https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/classifications/australian-and-new-zealand-standard-research-classification-anzsrc/latest-release |
ARC Board | the ARC Board is appointed by the Minister and consists of the Chair, Deputy Chair and up to seven other members. The ARC Board’s functions include determining priorities, strategies and policies for the ARC. The ARC Board is the Accountable Authority of the Australian Research Council. |
ARC College of Experts | the body of experts of international standing appointed to assist the ARC to identify research excellence, moderate external assessments and recommend applications for funding. Its members are specialist and generalist experts in their knowledge fields drawn from the Australian research community. The ARC website provides information on who is a member of the College of Experts. |
assessment criteria | the specified principles or standards, against which applications will be considered. These criteria are also used to assess the merits of applications and, in the case of a competitive grant opportunity, to determine application rankings. |
assessment round | there may be one or more assessment rounds within each Linkage Projects grant opportunity. Assessment round dates will be available on the ARC website. |
Australian Government priority areas | any areas identified by the Australian Government as priorities for research . |
bench fees | fees that an organisation charges for an individual to use infrastructure which would normally be provided by the organisation for their employees. This infrastructure may vary and could include, for example, an office or laboratory space with appropriate equipment, or access to non-specialised equipment owned by the organisation. |
Cash contribution | the cash from an organisation, which is transferred to and managed by the Administering Organisation. |
Chief Investigator | a participant who satisfies the eligibility criteria for a CI under these grant guidelines. |
Consultancy | the provision of specialist advice, analysis, assistance, services or products to another organisation(s), generally where the consultancy services are for the sole or preferred use of that other organisation(s). |
date of effect | the date on which a grant agreement is signed or a specified starting date. |
Detailed Assessors | assessors who are assigned applications to review for their specific expertise in a field of research. |
Eligibility criteria | the mandatory criteria which must be met to qualify for a grant. Assessment criteria may apply in addition to eligibility criteria. |
Eligible Organisation | an organisation listed in Appendix B of these grant guidelines. |
Exempt Archive and Public Record Office | means a non-profit organisation which holds a significant national, state or regional collection of data or documents for the purposes of public information and record-keeping and available for the purposes of research. |
Exempt Charity | means an organisation which meets the definition of a charity under relevant legislation of any given jurisdiction. In Australia, this means any charity as defined in the Charities Act 2013. |
Exempt Herbarium | means a non-profit, established institution in the service of society, which acquires, conserves, and researches preserved and labelled plant specimens, arranged to allow easy access and archival storage with a mission to preserve and document the diversity of plants.
|
Exempt Museum and Collecting Organisation | means a non-profit, established institution in the service of society and its development, open to the public, which acquires, conserves, researches, communicates and exhibits the tangible and intangible heritage of humanity and its environment for the purposes of education, study and enjoyment. Adapted from: Museum Definition – International Council of Museums – International Council of Museums (icom.museum) |
Exempt Non-Profit Organisation | means an organisation that does not operate for the profit or gain of its individual members, either directly or indirectly, while the organisation is operating and when it winds up. This definition is based on the Australian Taxation Office (ATO) definition of a non-profit organisation, which is available on the ATO website. |
Exempt Small Business | means an organisation which has fewer than twenty full-time employees. |
Exempt Start-up | means a company that is commercialising research and development (R&D) activities and has an average annual revenue over the previous two years of income that does not exceed $5 million per year. The start-up must have a majority of its employees (by number) and assets (by value) inside Australia. |
experimental development | experimental development is systematic work, drawing on knowledge gained from research and practical experience and producing additional knowledge, which is directed to producing new products or processes or to improving existing products or processes. https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/classifications/australian-and-new-zealand-standard-research-classification-anzsrc/latest-release |
Field research | the collection of information integral to the project outside a laboratory, library or workplace setting and often in a location external to the individual’s normal place of employment. |
Grant activity | the project/tasks/services that the grantee is required to undertake. A project consists of a number of grant activities. |
Grant agreement | the agreement entered into by the ARC and an Administering Organisation when an application from that organisation is approved for grant funding. This was previously referred to as a ‘Funding Agreement’. |
Grant commencement date | the date on which grant funding may commence. |
Grant Guidelines | grant guidelines, otherwise known as funding rules, are rules approved by the Minister under section 59 (including as varied under section 60) of the ARC Act. |
Grant offer | the details listed in the ARC’s RMS under ‘Funding Offers’ showing the project details and grant amount. |
GrantConnect | the Australian Government’s whole-of-government grants information system, which centralises the publication and reporting of Commonwealth grants in accordance with the CGRPs. |
Grantee | the Administering Organisation which has been selected to receive a grant. |
Grant opportunity | the specific grant round or process where a Commonwealth grant is made available to potential grantees. Grant opportunities may be open or targeted, and will reflect the relevant grant selection process. Each Linkage Projects grant opportunity may have one or more assessment rounds. |
Grant recipient | an individual or organisation who has received grant funding from the ARC. |
GST | the meaning as given in section 195-1 of the A New Tax System (Goods and Services Tax) Act 1999. |
Higher Degree by Research (HDR) | a ‘Research Doctorate or Research Masters program, for which at least two-thirds of the student load for the program is required as research work’ as defined by the Commonwealth Scholarships Guidelines (Research) 2017. |
Honorary academic appointment | An honorary academic appointment for eligibility purposes means a position that gives full academic status to the researcher, as certified by the Deputy Vice-Chancellor (Research) (or equivalent) in the application. The researcher must have access to research support comparable to employees e.g., an emeritus appointment. The researcher is not eligible to be a Chief Investigator using their honorary academic appointment if they are employed by an organisation other than an Eligible Organisation for more than 0.2 FTE. |
In-kind contribution | a contribution of goods, services, materials and/or time to the project from an individual, business or organisation. Values should be calculated based on the most likely actual cost, for example, current market, preferred provider or internal provider rates/valuations/rentals/charges (that is in the financial year of the date of the application) of the costs of labour, workspaces, equipment and databases. The calculations covering time and costs should be documented by the Administering Organisation. We may require these calculations to be audited. |
Instructions to Applicants | a set of instructions prepared by the ARC to assist applicants in completing the application form. |
Legislative instrument | a law on matters of detail made by a person or body authorised to do so by the relevant enabling legislation. |
Linkage Program | the schemes currently funded under the Linkage Program of the NCGP consist of: ARC Centres of Excellence, Industry Early Career Fellowships, Industry Mid-Career Fellowships, Industry Laureate Fellowships, Industrial Transformation Research Hubs, Industrial Transformation Training Centres, Linkage Projects, Linkage Infrastructure, Equipment and Facilities, Learned Academies Special Projects, Supporting Responses to Commonwealth Science Council Priorities, Special Research Initiatives and other grant opportunities as announced under the Linkage Program. |
medical research | medical research as defined in the ARC Medical Research Policy (2025 version) available on the ARC website. |
Named participants | individual researchers nominated for particular roles in an application. |
Other Eligible Organisation | an organisation listed in Appendix B of these grant guidelines which is not the Administering Organisation on an application. |
Other material resources | resources where a monetary value is not relevant or to which it is difficult to assign a monetary value, for example, access to restricted data, samples or documents. |
Other Organisation | an organisation that is not an Eligible Organisation and not a Partner Organisation that contributes to the research project. |
Partner Investigator | a named participant who satisfies the eligibility criteria for a PI under these grant guidelines. |
Project | an application approved by the ARC Accountable Authority to receive funding from the ARC. |
Project activity period | the period during which a project is receiving funding according to the original grant offer, or has any carryover funds approved by the ARC, or an approved variation to the project’s end date. During this period, the project is known as an active project. |
Project end date | the expected date that the project activity is completed and by which all grant funding will be spent. |
Project Leader | means the named participant from the Administering Organisation who is the first-named CI on an application. |
pure basic research | basic research carried out for the advancement of knowledge, without seeking long-term economic or social benefits or making any effort to apply the results to practical problems or to transfer the results to sectors responsible for their application. https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/classifications/australian-and-new-zealand-standard-research-classification-anzsrc/latest-release |
Research | for the purposes of these grant guidelines, the creation of new knowledge and/or the use of existing knowledge in a new and creative way so as to generate new concepts, methodologies, inventions and understandings. This could include synthesis and analysis of previous research to the extent that it is new and creative. This definition of research is consistent with a broad notion of research and Experimental Development comprising “creative and systematic work undertaken in order to increase the stock of knowledge – including knowledge of humankind, culture and society – and to devise new applications of available knowledge” OECD (2015), Frascati Manual 2015: Guidelines for Collecting and Reporting Data on Research and Experimental Development (p.378). |
research end-user | A person, community or organisation that stands to benefit from the outputs of research. In the context of the Linkage Program, end-users may include, but are not limited to, industry, government, communities, and not-for-profit organisations. |
research infrastructure | the assets, facilities, services, and coordinated access to major national and/or international research facilities or consortia which directly support research in higher education organisations and more broadly, and which maintain the capacity of researchers to undertake excellent research and deliver innovative outcomes. |
Research Office | a business unit within an Eligible Organisation that is responsible for contact with the ARC regarding applications and projects. |
Selection Advisory Committee (SAC) | a group of experts from academia and research end-users appointed to assist the ARC to assess applications and to provide a recommendation for funding to the ARC Accountable Authority. A SAC may be drawn from the ARC College of Experts. |
selection process | the method used to select potential grantees. This process may involve comparative assessment of applications or the assessment of applications against the eligibility criteria and/or the assessment criteria. |
Special Condition | a condition specified in a grant offer which governs the use of the funding provided by the ARC. |
strategic basic research | experimental and theoretical work undertaken to acquire new knowledge directed into specified broad areas in the expectation of practical discoveries. It provides the broad base of knowledge necessary for the solution of recognised practical problems. https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/classifications/australian-and-new-zealand-standard-research-classification-anzsrc/latest-release |
travel costs | the domestic and international economy travel costs associated with the project, including to foster and strengthen collaboration between researchers in Australia and overseas. |
value for money | ‘value for money’ is a judgement based on the application representing an efficient, effective, economical and ethical use of public resources determined from a variety of considerations: merit of the application, risk, cost and expected contribution to outcome achievement. |
Variation of grant agreement (Variation) | a request submitted to the ARC in RMS to agree a change in the grant agreement. |
We | the Australian Research Council (ARC). ‘Us’ and ‘Our’ are also used in this context. |
You | the Eligible Organisation that submitted the application. ‘Your’ is also used in this context. |
Organisation Name | Organisation ABN |
| Organisation Name | Organisation ABN |
Adelaide University | 41 202 953 738 |
| Swinburne University of Technology | 13 628 586 699 |
Australian Catholic University | 15 050 192 660 |
| ||
Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies | 62 020 533 641 |
| The Australian National University | 52 234 063 906 |
Avondale University | 53 108 186 401 |
| The University of Adelaide | 61 249 878 937 |
Batchelor Institute of Indigenous Tertiary Education | 32 039 179 166 |
| The University of Melbourne | 84 002 705 224 |
Bond University | 88 010 694 121 |
| The University of New England | 75 792 454 315 |
Central Queensland University | 39 181 103 288 |
| The University of New South Wales | 57 195 873 179 |
Charles Darwin University | 54 093 513 649 |
| The University of Newcastle | 15 736 576 735 |
Charles Sturt University | 83 878 708 551 |
| The University of Notre Dame Australia | 69 330 643 210 |
Curtin University | 99 143 842 569 |
| The University of Queensland | 63 942 912 684 |
Deakin University | 56 721 584 203 |
| The University of Sydney | 15 211 513 464 |
Edith Cowan University | 54 361 485 361 |
| The University of Western Australia | 37 882 817 280 |
Federation University Australia | 51 818 692 256 |
| Torrens University Australia | 99 154 937 005 |
Flinders University | 65 542 596 200 |
| University of Canberra | 81 633 873 422 |
Griffith University | 78 106 094 461 |
| University of Divinity | 95 290 912 141 |
James Cook University | 46 253 211 955 |
| University of South Australia | 37 191 313 308 |
La Trobe University | 64 804 735 113 |
| University of Southern Queensland | 40 234 732 081 |
Macquarie University | 90 952 801 237 |
| University of Tasmania | 30 764 374 782 |
Monash University | 12 377 614 012 |
| University of Technology Sydney | 77 257 686 961 |
Murdoch University | 61 616 369 313 |
| University of the Sunshine Coast | 28 441 859 157 |
Queensland University of Technology | 83 791 724 622 |
| University of Wollongong | 61 060 567 686 |
Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology | 49 781 030 034 |
| Victoria University | 83 776 954 731 |
Southern Cross University | 41 995 651 524 |
| Western Sydney University | 53 014 069 881 |