ASA 2025-4 (May 2025) |
Auditing Standard ASA 2025-4
Amendments to Australian Auditing Standards
Issued by the Auditing and Assurance Standards Board
This Auditing Standard is available on the Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (AUASB) website: www.auasb.gov.au
Auditing and Assurance Standards Board Phone: (03) 8080 7400 E-mail: enquiries@auasb.gov.au Postal Address: PO Box 204, Collins Street West Melbourne Victoria 8007 AUSTRALIA |
|
© 2025 Commonwealth of Australia. The text, graphics and layout of this Auditing Standard are protected by Australian copyright law and the comparable law of other countries. Reproduction within Australia in unaltered form (retaining this notice) is permitted for personal and non‑commercial use subject to the inclusion of an acknowledgment of the source as being the Australian Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (AUASB).
Requests and enquiries concerning reproduction and rights for commercial purposes should be addressed to the Director-National, Auditing and Assurance Standards Board, PO Box 204, Collins Street West, Melbourne, Victoria 8007 or sent to enquiries@auasb.gov.au. Otherwise, no part of this Auditing Standard may be reproduced, stored or transmitted in any form or by any means without the prior written permission of the AUASB except as permitted by law.
ISSN 1030-603X
PREFACE
AUTHORITY STATEMENT
CONFORMITY WITH INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS ON AUDITING
Paragraphs
Application...............................................................1-2
Operative Date..............................................................3
Introduction
Scope of this Auditing Standard..................................................4
Objective..................................................................5
Definition..................................................................6
Amendments to Auditing Standards............................................7-8
Amendments to ASA 210.....................................................9-10
Amendments to ASA 220......................................................11
Amendments to ASA 230....................................................12-13
Amendments to ASA 250....................................................14-15
Amendments to ASA 260....................................................16-19
Amendments to ASA 315....................................................20-22
Amendments to ASA 450......................................................23
Amendments to ASA 510....................................................24-27
Amendments to ASA 540....................................................28-29
Amendments to ASA 560......................................................30
Amendments to ASA 580......................................................31
Amendments to ASA 600....................................................32-33
Amendments to ASA 610......................................................34
Amendments to ASA 700....................................................35-42
Amendments to ASA 701....................................................43-47
Amendments to ASA 705....................................................48-57
Amendments to ASA 706....................................................58-64
Amendments to ASA 710....................................................65-71
Amendments to ASA 720....................................................72-80
Amendments to ASA 800....................................................81-84
The AUASB issues Auditing Standard ASA 2025-4 Amendments to Australian Auditing Standards pursuant to the requirements of the legislative provisions and the Strategic Direction explained below.
The AUASB is a non-corporate Commonwealth entity of the Australian Government established under section 227A of the Australian Securities and Investments Commission Act 2001, as amended (ASIC Act). Under section 336 of the Corporations Act 2001, the AUASB may make Auditing Standards for the purposes of the corporations legislation. These Auditing Standards are legislative instruments under the Legislation Act 2003.
Under the Strategic Direction given to the AUASB by the Financial Reporting Council (FRC), the AUASB is required, inter alia, to develop auditing standards that have a clear public interest focus and are of the highest quality.
This Auditing Standard makes amendments to the requirements and application and other explanatory material and appendices of the following Auditing Standards:
ASA 220 Quality Management for an Audit of a Financial Report and Other Historical Financial Information (Issued 10 March 2021 and amended to 27 April 2022)
ASA 230 Audit Documentation (Issued 27 October 2009 and amended to 27 April 2022)
ASA 250 Consideration of Laws and Regulations in an Audit of a Financial Report (Issued 30 May 2017 and amended to 27 April 2022)
ASA 260 Communication With Those Charged with Governance (Issued 1 December 2015 and amended to 28 January 2025)
ASA 315 Identifying and Assessing the Risks of Material Misstatement (Issued 1 February 2020 and amended to 27 April 2022)
ASA 450 Evaluation of Misstatements Identified during the Audit (Issued 27 October 2009 and amended to 30 May 2017)
ASA 510 Initial Audit Engagements-Opening Balances (Issued 27 October 2009 and amended to 15 March 2023)
ASA 540 Auditing Accounting Estimates and Related Disclosures (Issued 5 December 2018 and amended to 5 November 2021)
ASA 560 Subsequent Events (Issued 27 October 2009 and amended to 5 November 2021)
ASA 580 Written Representations (Issued 27 October 2009 and amended to 15 March 2023)
ASA 600 Special Considerations—Audits of a Group Financial Report (Including the Work of Component Auditors) (Issued 13 May 2022 and amended to 16 December 2024)
ASA 610 Using the Work of Internal Auditors (Issued 11 November 2013 and amended to 27 April 2022)
ASA 700 Forming an Opinion and Reporting on a Financial Report (Issued 1 December 2015 and amended to 28 January 2025)
ASA 701 Communicating Key Audit Matters in the Independent Auditor’s Report (Issued 1 December 2015 and amended to 27 April 2022)
ASA 705 Modifications to the Opinion in the Independent Auditor's Report (Issued 1 December 2015 and amended to 15 March 2023)
ASA 706 Emphasis of Matter Paragraphs and Other Matter Paragraphs in the Independent Auditor's Report (Issued 1 December 2015 and amended to 15 March 2023)
ASA 710 Comparative Information-Corresponding Figures and Comparative Financial Reports (Issued 27 October 2009 and amended to 15 March 2023)
ASA 720 The Auditor's Responsibilities Relating to Other Information (Issued 1 December 2015 and amended to 28 January 2025)
ASA 800 Special Considerations—Audits of Financial Reports Prepared in Accordance with Special Purpose Frameworks (Issued 26 July 2016 and amended to 7 September 2021)
The amendments arise from changes made by the International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB) to ISA 570 (Revised), Going Concern. Under the Strategic Direction given to the AUASB by the Financial Reporting Council (FRC), the AUASB is required to have regard to any programme initiated by the IAASB for the revision and enhancement of the International Standards on Auditing (ISAs) and to make appropriate consequential amendments to the Australian Auditing Standards.
The Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (AUASB) makes this Auditing Standard ASA 2025-4 Amendments to Australian Auditing Standards pursuant to section 227B of the Australian Securities and Investments Commission Act 2001 and section 336 of the Corporations Act 2001.
Dated: 14 May 2025 D Niven
Chair - AUASB
The form and content of the audit engagement letter may vary for each entity. Information included in the audit engagement letter on the auditor’s responsibilities may be based on ASA 200.17 Paragraphs 6(b) and 12 deal with the description of the responsibilities of management. In addition to including the matters required by paragraph 10, an audit engagement letter may make reference to, for example:
Example of an Audit Engagement Letter
…
[The responsibilities of the auditor]
We will conduct our audit in accordance with Australian Auditing Standards. Those standards require that we comply with ethical requirements. As part of an audit in accordance with Australian Auditing Standards, we exercise professional judgement and maintain professional scepticism throughout the audit. We also:
Our audit will be conducted on the basis that [management and, where appropriate, those charged with governance]25 acknowledge and understand that they have responsibility:
(c) To provide us with:27
Aus (d) …
The engagement partner exercises professional judgement in identifying the areas of significant judgement made by the engagement team. The firm’s policies or procedures may specify certain matters that are commonly expected to be significant judgements. Significant judgements in relation to the audit engagement may include matters related to the overall audit strategy and audit plan for undertaking the engagement, the execution of the engagement and the overall conclusions reached by the engagement team, for example:
Some examples of circumstances in which, in accordance with paragraph 8, it is appropriate to prepare audit documentation relating to the use of professional judgement include, where the matters and judgements are significant:
Specific Audit Documentation Requirements in Other Australian Auditing Standards
This appendix identifies paragraphs in other Australian Auditing Standards that contain specific documentation requirements. The list is not a substitute for considering the requirements and related application and other explanatory material in Australian Auditing Standards.
If the auditor has identified or suspects non-compliance with laws and regulations, the auditor shall determine whether law, regulation or relevant ethical requirements: (Ref: Para. A28–A34)
Certain other laws and regulations may need particular attention by the auditor because they have a fundamental effect on the operations of the entity (as described in paragraph 6(b)). Non‑compliance with laws and regulations that have a fundamental effect on the operations of the entity may cause the entity to cease operations, or call into question the entity’s ability to continuecontinuance as a going concern.12 For example, non‑compliance with the requirements of the entity’s license or other entitlement to perform its operations could have such an impact (e.g., for a bank, non‑compliance with capital or investment requirements). There are also many laws and regulations relating principally to the operating aspects of the entity that typically do not affect the financial report and are not captured by the entity’s information systems relevant to financial reporting.
Significant difficulties encountered during the audit may include such matters as:
Circumstances in which the auditor is required or may otherwise consider it necessary to include additional information in the auditor’s report in accordance with the Australian Auditing Standards, and for which communication with those charged with governance is required, include when, for example:
See ASA 570 Going Concern, paragraph 42(f)25(d).
This appendix identifies paragraphs in ASQM 131 and other Australian Auditing Standards that require communication of specific matters with those charged with governance. The list is not a substitute for considering the requirements and related application and other explanatory material in Australian Auditing Standards.
See ASA 570, paragraphs A2519‒20.
Risks of material misstatement at the financial report level refer to risks that relate pervasively to the financial report as a whole, and potentially affect many assertions. Risks of this nature are not necessarily risks identifiable with specific assertions at the class of transactions, account balance or disclosure level (e.g., risk of management override of controls). Rather, they represent circumstances that may pervasively increase the risks of material misstatement at the assertion level. The auditor’s evaluation of whether risks identified relate pervasively to the financial report supports the auditor’s assessment of the risks of material misstatement at the financial report level. In other cases, a number of assertions may also be identified as susceptible to the risk, and may therefore affect the auditor’s risk identification and assessment of risks of material misstatement at the assertion level.
Example:
The entity faces operating losses and liquidity issues and is reliant on funding that has not yet been secured. In such a circumstance, the auditor may determineconclude that management’s use of the going concern basis of accounting gives rise to a risk of material misstatement at the financial report level. In this situation, the accounting framework may need to be applied using a liquidation basis, which would likely affect all assertions pervasively.
A business risk may have an immediate consequence for the risk of material misstatement for classes of transactions, account balances, and disclosures at the assertion level or the financial report level. For example, the business risk arising from a significant fall in real estate market values may increase the risk of material misstatement associated with the valuation assertion for a lender of medium-term real estate backed loans. However, the same risk, particularly in combination with a severe economic downturn that concurrently increases the underlying risk of lifetime credit losses on its loans, may also have a longer-term consequence. The resulting net exposure to credit losses may indicate an event or condition that may cast significant doubt on the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern. If so, this could have implications for management’s, and the auditor’s, conclusion as to the appropriateness of the entity’s use of the going concern basis of accounting, and determinationconclusion as to whether a material uncertainty exists. Whether a business risk may result in a risk of material misstatement is, therefore, considered in light of the entity’s circumstances. Examples of events and conditions that may give rise to the existence of risks of material misstatement are indicated in Appendix 2.
In addition, each individual misstatement of a qualitative disclosure is considered to evaluate its effect on the relevant disclosure(s), as well as its overall effect on the financial report as a whole. The determination of whether a misstatement(s) in a qualitative disclosure is material, in the context of the applicable financial reporting framework and the specific circumstances of the entity, is a matter that involves the exercise of professional judgement. Examples where such misstatements may be material include:
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT
…
Basis for Qualified Opinion
…
Going Concern
In the context of our audit of the financial report as a whole, and in forming our opinion thereon, we have concluded that management’s use of the going concern basis of accounting in the preparation of the financial report is appropriate. Based on the audit evidence obtained, we have not identified a material uncertainty related to events or conditions that may cast significant doubt on the Entity’s ability to continue as a going concern.
Our conclusions are based on the audit evidence obtained up to the date of our auditor’s report and are not a guarantee as to the Entity’s ability to continue as a going concern.
…
Other Matter
…
Basis for Qualified Opinion
…
Going Concern
In the context of our audit of the financial report as a whole, and in forming our opinion thereon, we have concluded that management’s use of the going concern basis of accounting in the preparation of the financial report is appropriate. Based on the audit evidence obtained, we have not identified a material uncertainty related to events or conditions that may cast significant doubt on the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.
Our conclusions are based on the audit evidence obtained up to the date of our auditor’s report and are not a guarantee as to the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.
…
Other Matter
…
In some cases, the estimation uncertainty relating to an accounting estimate may affect the auditor’s professional judgement as to whether a material uncertainty exists related to events or conditions that may cast significant doubt abouton the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern. ASA 57049 establishes requirements and provides guidance in such circumstances.
Indicators of possible management bias may affect the auditor’s conclusion as to whether the auditor’s risk assessment and related responses remain appropriate. The auditor may also need to consider the implications for other aspects of the audit,[61] including the need to further question the appropriateness of management’s judgements in making accounting estimates. Further, indicators of possible management bias may affect the auditor’s conclusion as to whether the financial report as a whole is free from material misstatement, as discussed in ASA 700.61
In enquiring of management and, where appropriate, those charged with governance, as to whether any subsequent events have occurred that might affect the financial report, the auditor may enquire as to the current status of items that were accounted for on the basis of preliminary or inconclusive data and may make specific enquiries about the following matters:
List of Australian Auditing Standards Containing Requirements for Written Representations
…
ASA 560 Subsequent Events – paragraph 9
ASA 570 Going Concern – paragraphs 39–40 16(e)
ASA 710 Comparative Information—Corresponding Figures and Comparative Financial Reports – paragraph 9
…
Basis for Qualified Opinion
…
Going Concern
In the context of our audit of the financial report as a whole, and in forming our opinion thereon, we have concluded that management’s use of the going concern basis of accounting in the preparation of the consolidated financial report is appropriate. Based on the audit evidence obtained, we have not identified a material uncertainty related to events or conditions that may cast significant doubt on the Group’s ability to continue as a going concern.
Our conclusions are based on the audit evidence obtained up to the date of our auditor’s report and are not a guarantee as to the Group’s ability to continue as a going concern.
…
Since the external auditor has sole responsibility for the audit opinion expressed, the external auditor needs to make the significant judgements in the audit engagement in accordance with paragraph 18. Significant judgements include the following:
Where applicable, tThe auditor shall report in accordance with ASA 570.13
See ASA 570 Going Concern, paragraphs 34-3821–23.
If the auditor is required by law or regulation of a specific jurisdiction to use a specific layout, or wording of the auditor’s report, the auditor’s report shall refer to Australian Auditing Standards only if the auditor’s report includes, at a minimum, each of the following elements: (Ref: Para. A70–A71)
(a) A title.
(b) …
(f) Where applicable, a section that addresses, and is not inconsistent with, the reporting requirements in paragraphs 34-35 and 36(c) 22 of ASA 570.
(g) Where applicable, a Basis for Qualified (or Adverse) Opinion section that addresses, and is not inconsistent with, the reporting requirements in paragraph 35(b)23 of ASA 570.
(h) …
Basis for Opinion
…
Going Concern
In the context of our audit of the financial report as a whole, and in forming our opinion thereon, we have concluded that management’s use of the going concern basis of accounting in the preparation of the financial report is appropriate. Based on the audit evidence obtained, we have not identified a material uncertainty related to events or conditions that may cast significant doubt on the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.
Our conclusions are based on the audit evidence obtained up to the date of our auditor’s report and are not a guarantee as to the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.
…
Basis for Opinion
…
Going Concern
In the context of our audit of the financial report as a whole, and in forming our opinion thereon, we have concluded that management’s use of the going concern basis of accounting in the preparation of the consolidated financial report is appropriate. Based on the audit evidence obtained, we have not identified a material uncertainty related to events or conditions that may cast significant doubt on the Group’s ability to continue as a going concern.
Our conclusions are based on the audit evidence obtained up to the date of our auditor’s report and are not a guarantee as to the Group’s ability to continue as a going concern.
…
Basis for Opinion
…
Going Concern
In the context of our audit of the financial report as a whole, and in forming our opinion thereon, we have concluded that management’s use of the going concern basis of accounting in the preparation of the financial report is appropriate. Based on the audit evidence obtained, we have not identified a material uncertainty related to events or conditions that may cast significant doubt on the Entity’s ability to continue as a going concern.
Our conclusions are based on the audit evidence obtained up to the date of our auditor’s report and are not a guarantee as to the Entity’s ability to continue as a going concern.
…
Basis for Opinion
…
Going Concern
In the context of our audit of the financial report as a whole, and in forming our opinion thereon, we have concluded that management’s use of the going concern basis of accounting in the preparation of the financial report is appropriate. Based on the audit evidence obtained, we have not identified a material uncertainty related to events or conditions that may cast significant doubt on the Entity’s ability to continue as a going concern.
Our conclusions are based on the audit evidence obtained up to the date of our auditor’s report and are not a guarantee as to the Entity’s ability to continue as a going concern.
…
Communicating key audit matters in the auditor’s report is in the context of the auditor having formed an opinion on the financial report as a whole. Communicating key audit matters in the auditor’s report is not:
See ASA 570 Going Concern, paragraphs 34-3822–23.
The following are, by their nature, key audit matters: aA matter giving rise to a modified opinion in accordance with ASA 705 or, in accordance with ASA 570, or a material uncertainty related to events or conditions that may cast significant doubt on the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern or when significant judgements were made by management in concluding that there is no material uncertainty.in accordance with ASA 570, are by their nature key audit matters. However, in such circumstances, these matters shall not be described in the Key Audit Matters section of the auditor’s report and the requirements in paragraphs 13–14 of this Auditing Standard do not apply. Rather, the auditor shall:
In addition to referring to related disclosure(s), the auditor may draw attention to key aspects of them. The extent of disclosure by management about specific aspects or factors in relation to how a particular matter is affecting the financial report of the current period may help the auditor in pinpointing particular aspects of how the matter was addressed in the audit such that intended users can understand why the matter is a key audit matter. For example:
When the auditor disclaims an opinion due to an inability to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence, the auditor shall:
Unless required by law or regulation, when the auditor disclaims an opinion on the financial report, the auditor’s report shall not include a section on:
(a) a Key Audit Matters section in accordance with ASA 701;4
(b) Going Concern in accordance with ASA 570;[5]
(c) Material Uncertainty Related to Going Concern in accordance with ASA 570;[6] and
(d) or an Other Information section in accordance with ASA 720.5 (Ref: Para. A26)
Providing the reasons for the auditor’s inability to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence within the Basis for Disclaimer of Opinion section of the auditor’s report provides useful information to users in understanding why the auditor has disclaimed an opinion on the financial report and may further guard against inappropriate reliance on them. However, communication of any key audit matters other than the matter(s) giving rise to the disclaimer of opinion may suggest that the financial report as a whole are more credible in relation to those matters than would be appropriate in the circumstances, and would be inconsistent with the disclaimer of opinion on the financial report as a whole. Similarly, it would not be appropriate to include an Other Information section in accordance with ASA 720 addressing the auditor’s consideration of the consistency of the other information with the financial report. Accordingly, paragraph 29 prohibits a Key Audit Matters section or an Other Informationcertain sections from being included in the auditor’s report when the auditor disclaims an opinion on the financial report, unless the auditor is otherwise required by law or regulation to communicate key audit matters or to report on other information.
…
Going Concern
In the context of our audit of the financial report as a whole, and in forming our opinion thereon, we have concluded that management’s use of the going concern basis of accounting in the preparation of the financial report is appropriate. Based on the audit evidence obtained, we have not identified a material uncertainty related to events or conditions that may cast significant doubt on the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.
Our conclusions are based on the audit evidence obtained up to the date of our auditor’s report and are not a guarantee as to the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.
…
Basis for Adverse Opinion
…
Going Concern
In the context of our audit of the financial report as a whole, and in forming our opinion thereon, we have concluded that management’s use of the going concern basis of accounting in the preparation of the consolidated financial report is appropriate. Based on the audit evidence obtained, we have not identified a material uncertainty related to events or conditions that may cast significant doubt on the Group’s ability to continue as a going concern.
Our conclusions are based on the audit evidence obtained up to the date of our auditor’s report and are not a guarantee as to the Group’s ability to continue as a going concern.
…
Basis for Qualified Opinion
…
Going Concern
In the context of our audit of the financial report as a whole, and in forming our opinion thereon, we have concluded that management’s use of the going concern basis of accounting in the preparation of the consolidated financial report is appropriate. Based on the audit evidence obtained, we have not identified a material uncertainty related to events or conditions that may cast significant doubt on the Group’s ability to continue as a going concern.
Our conclusions are based on the audit evidence obtained up to the date of our auditor’s report and are not a guarantee as to the Group’s ability to continue as a going concern.
…
Basis for Disclaimer of Opinion
The Group’s investment in its joint venture XYZ Entity is carried at $xxx on the consolidated statement of financial position, which represents over 90% of the Group’s net assets as at 30 June 20X1. We were not allowed access to the management and the auditors of XYZ Entity, including XYZ Entity’s auditor’s audit documentation. As a result, we were unable to determine whether any adjustments were necessary in respect of the Group’s proportional share of XYZ Entity’s assets that it controls jointly, its proportional share of XYZ Entity’s liabilities for which it is jointly responsible, its proportional share of XYZ’s income and expenses for the year, and the elements making up the consolidated statement of changes in equity and the consolidated cash flow statement.
We are unable to conclude on the appropriateness of management’s use of the going concern basis of accounting in the preparation of the consolidated financial report and whether a material uncertainty exists related to events or conditions that may cast significant doubt on the Group’s ability to continue as a going concern.
…
Basis for Disclaimer of Opinion
We were not appointed as auditors of the Entity until after 30 June 20X1 and thus did not observe the counting of physical inventories at the beginning and end of the year. We were unable to satisfy ourselves by alternative means concerning the inventory quantities held at 30 June 20X0 and 20X1, which are stated in the statements of financial position at $xxx and $xxx, respectively. In addition, the introduction of a new computerised accounts receivable system in September 20X1 resulted in numerous errors in accounts receivable. As of the date of our report, management was still in the process of rectifying the system deficiencies and correcting the errors. We were unable to confirm or verify by alternative means accounts receivable included in the statement of financial position at a total amount of $xx as at 30 June 20X1. As a result of these matters, we were unable to determine whether any adjustments might have been found necessary in respect of recorded or unrecorded inventories and accounts receivable, and the elements making up the statement of comprehensive income, statement of changes in equity and statement of cash flows.
We are unable to conclude on the appropriateness of management’s use of the going concern basis of accounting in the preparation of the financial report and whether a material uncertainty exists related to events or conditions that may cast significant doubt on the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.
…
Examples of circumstances where the auditor may consider it necessary to include an Emphasis of Matter paragraph are:
The inclusion of an Emphasis of Matter paragraph in the auditor’s report does not affect the auditor’s opinion. An Emphasis of Matter paragraph is not a substitute for:
See ASA 570, paragraphs 34-3822–23.
The placement of an Emphasis of Matter paragraph or Other Matter paragraph in the auditor’s report depends on the nature of the information to be communicated, and the auditor’s judgement as to the relative significance of such information to intended users compared to other elements required to be reported in accordance with ASA 700. For example:
Emphasis of Matter Paragraphs
Basis for Opinion
…
Going Concern
In the context of our audit of the financial report as a whole, and in forming our opinion thereon, we have concluded that management’s use of the going concern basis of accounting in the preparation of the financial report is appropriate. Based on the audit evidence obtained, we have not identified a material uncertainty related to events or conditions that may cast significant doubt on the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.
Our conclusions are based on the audit evidence obtained up to the date of our auditor’s report and are not a guarantee as to the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.
…
Basis for Qualified Opinion
…
Going Concern
In the context of our audit of the financial report as a whole, and in forming our opinion thereon, we have concluded that management’s use of the going concern basis of accounting in the preparation of the financial report is appropriate. Based on the audit evidence obtained, we have not identified a material uncertainty related to events or conditions that may cast significant doubt on the Entity’s ability to continue as a going concern.
Our conclusions are based on the audit evidence obtained up to the date of our auditor’s report and are not a guarantee as to the Entity’s ability to continue as a going concern.
…
Basis for Qualified Opinion
…
Going Concern
In the context of our audit of the financial report as a whole, and in forming our opinion thereon, we have concluded that management’s use of the going concern basis of accounting in the preparation of the financial report is appropriate. Based on the audit evidence obtained, we have not identified a material uncertainty related to events or conditions that may cast significant doubt on the Entity’s ability to continue as a going concern.
Our conclusions are based on the audit evidence obtained up to the date of our auditor’s report and are not a guarantee as to the Entity’s ability to continue as a going concern.
…
Basis for Qualified Opinion
…
Going Concern
In the context of our audit of the financial report as a whole, and in forming our opinion thereon, we have concluded that management’s use of the going concern basis of accounting in the preparation of the financial report is appropriate. Based on the audit evidence obtained, we have not identified a material uncertainty related to events or conditions that may cast significant doubt on the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.
Our conclusions are based on the audit evidence obtained up to the date of our auditor’s report and are not a guarantee as to the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.
…
Basis for Qualified Opinion
…
Going Concern
In the context of our audit of the financial report as a whole, and in forming our opinion thereon, we have concluded that management’s use of the going concern basis of accounting in the preparation of the financial report is appropriate. Based on the audit evidence obtained, we have not identified a material uncertainty related to events or conditions that may cast significant doubt on the Entity’s ability to continue as a going concern.
Our conclusions are based on the audit evidence obtained up to the date of our auditor’s report and are not a guarantee as to the Entity’s ability to continue as a going concern.
…
Basis for Qualified Opinion
…
Going Concern
In the context of our audit of the financial report as a whole, and in forming our opinion thereon, we have concluded that management’s use of the going concern basis of accounting in the preparation of the financial report is appropriate. Based on the audit evidence obtained, we have not identified a material uncertainty related to events or conditions that may cast significant doubt on the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.
Our conclusions are based on the audit evidence obtained up to the date of our auditor’s report and are not a guarantee as to the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.
…
Basis for Opinion
…
Going Concern
In the context of our audit of the financial report as a whole, and in forming our opinion thereon, we have concluded that management’s use of the going concern basis of accounting in the preparation of the financial report is appropriate. Based on the audit evidence obtained, we have not identified a material uncertainty related to events or conditions that may cast significant doubt on the Entity’s ability to continue as a going concern.
Our conclusions are based on the audit evidence obtained up to the date of our auditor’s report and are not a guarantee as to the Entity’s ability to continue as a going concern.
…
Basis for Qualified Opinion
…
Going Concern
In the context of our audit of the financial report as a whole, and in forming our opinion thereon, we have concluded that management’s use of the going concern basis of accounting in the preparation of the financial report is appropriate. Based on the audit evidence obtained, we have not identified a material uncertainty related to events or conditions that may cast significant doubt on the Entity’s ability to continue as a going concern.
Our conclusions are based on the audit evidence obtained up to the date of our auditor’s report and are not a guarantee as to the Entity’s ability to continue as a going concern.
…
The auditor’s knowledge obtained in the audit may also include matters that are prospective in nature. Such matters may include, for example, business prospects and future cash flows that the auditor considered when evaluating the assumptions used by management in performing impairment tests on intangible assets such as goodwill, or when evaluating management’s assessment of the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern.[13]
Basis for Opinion
…
Going Concern
In the context of our audit of the financial report as a whole, and in forming our opinion thereon, we have concluded that management’s use of the going concern basis of accounting in the preparation of the financial report is appropriate. Based on the audit evidence obtained, we have not identified a material uncertainty related to events or conditions that may cast significant doubt on the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.
Our conclusions are based on the audit evidence obtained up to the date of our auditor’s report and are not a guarantee as to the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.
…
Basis for Opinion
…
Going Concern
In the context of our audit of the financial report as a whole, and in forming our opinion thereon, we have concluded that management’s use of the going concern basis of accounting in the preparation of the financial report is appropriate. Based on the audit evidence obtained, we have not identified a material uncertainty related to events or conditions that may cast significant doubt on the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.
Our conclusions are based on the audit evidence obtained up to the date of our auditor’s report and are not a guarantee as to the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.
…
Basis for Opinion
…
Going Concern
In the context of our audit of the financial report as a whole, and in forming our opinion thereon, we have concluded that management’s use of the going concern basis of accounting in the preparation of the financial report is appropriate. Based on the audit evidence obtained, we have not identified a material uncertainty related to events or conditions that may cast significant doubt on the Entity’s ability to continue as a going concern.
Our conclusions are based on the audit evidence obtained up to the date of our auditor’s report and are not a guarantee as to the Entity’s ability to continue as a going concern.
…
Basis for Opinion
…
Going Concern
In the context of our audit of the financial report as a whole, and in forming our opinion thereon, we have concluded that management’s use of the going concern basis of accounting in the preparation of the financial report is appropriate. Based on the audit evidence obtained, we have not identified a material uncertainty related to events or conditions that may cast significant doubt on the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.
Our conclusions are based on the audit evidence obtained up to the date of our auditor’s report and are not a guarantee as to the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.
…
Basis for Opinion
…
Going Concern
In the context of our audit of the financial report as a whole, and in forming our opinion thereon, we have concluded that management’s use of the going concern basis of accounting in the preparation of the financial report is appropriate. Based on the audit evidence obtained, we have not identified a material uncertainty related to events or conditions that may cast significant doubt on the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.
Our conclusions are based on the audit evidence obtained up to the date of our auditor’s report and are not a guarantee as to the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.
…
Basis for Qualified Opinion
…
Going Concern
In the context of our audit of the financial report as a whole, and in forming our opinion thereon, we have concluded that management’s use of the going concern basis of accounting in the preparation of the consolidated financial report is appropriate. Based on the audit evidence obtained, we have not identified a material uncertainty related to events or conditions that may cast significant doubt on the Group’s ability to continue as a going concern.
Our conclusions are based on the audit evidence obtained up to the date of our auditor’s report and are not a guarantee as to the Group’s ability to continue as a going concern.
…
Basis for Adverse Opinion
…
Going Concern
In the context of our audit of the financial report as a whole, and in forming our opinion thereon, we have concluded that management’s use of the going concern basis of accounting in the preparation of the consolidated financial report is appropriate. Based on the audit evidence obtained, we have not identified a material uncertainty related to events or conditions that may cast significant doubt on the Group’s ability to continue as a going concern.
Our conclusions are based on the audit evidence obtained up to the date of our auditor’s report and are not a guarantee as to the Group’s ability to continue as a going concern.
…
Basis for Opinion
…
Going Concern
In the context of our audit of the financial report as a whole, and in forming our opinion thereon, we have concluded that management’s use of the going concern basis of accounting in the preparation of the financial report is appropriate. Based on the audit evidence obtained, we have not identified a material uncertainty related to events or conditions that may cast significant doubt on the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.
Our conclusions are based on the audit evidence obtained up to the date of our auditor’s report and are not a guarantee as to the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.
…
Basis for Opinion
…
Going Concern
In the context of our audit of the financial report as a whole, and in forming our opinion thereon, we have concluded that management’s use of the going concern basis of accounting in the preparation of the financial report is appropriate. Based on the audit evidence obtained, we have not identified a material uncertainty related to events or conditions that may cast significant doubt on the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.
Our conclusions are based on the audit evidence obtained up to the date of our auditor’s report and are not a guarantee as to the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.
…
Basis for Opinion
…
Going Concern
In the context of our audit of the financial report as a whole, and in forming our opinion thereon, we have concluded that management’s use of the going concern basis of accounting in the preparation of the financial report is appropriate. Based on the audit evidence obtained, we have not identified a material uncertainty related to events or conditions that may cast significant doubt on the Entity’s ability to continue as a going concern.
Our conclusions are based on the audit evidence obtained up to the date of our auditor’s report and are not a guarantee as to the Entity’s ability to continue as a going concern.
…
For legal purposes, each provision of this instrument specified in column 1 of the table commences, or is taken to have commenced in accordance with column 2 of the table. Any other statement in column 2 has effect according to its terms.
Commencement information | ||
Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
Provisions | Commencement | Date/Details |
The whole of this instrument | 14 December 2026. | 14 December 2026. |
Note: This table relates only to the provisions of this instrument as originally made. It will not be amended to deal with any later amendments of this instrument.
[19] See ASA 570 Going Concern, paragraph 21.
[20] See ASA 570 paragraphs 34(b)(ii) and 35(b).
[21] See ASA 701 Communicating Key Audit Matters in the Independent Auditor’s Report.
[7] See ASA 570 Going Concern.
[13] See ASA 570 Going Concern, paragraph 42(e).
[13] See ASA 570 Going Concern, paragraphs 32-33.
[61] See ASA 570, paragraphs A68-A71.
[5] See ASA 570 Going Concern, paragraph 34.
[6] See ASA 570, paragraphs 35-36.
[13] See ASA 570 Going Concern.