Penalty: $2,000 or imprisonment for 2 years, or both.
engage in conduct means:
- (a)
- do an act; or
- (b)
- omit to perform an act.
- (6)
- The Minister may, at any time, by notice in writing to the person to whom a permit has been granted:
- (a)
- revoke the permit;
- (b)
- suspend the permit; or
- (c)
- cancel the suspension of the permit.
- (7)
- A suspension of a permit may be of indefinite duration or for a specified period.
HISTORIC SHIPWRECKS ACT 1976
- SECT 16
Defences
It is a defence to a prosecution of a person for an offence against section 13, for an offence against a regulation made for the purposes of section 14, or for an offence against subsection 15(5), if the act that constituted the offence was done for the purpose of:
- (a)
- saving human life;
- (b)
- securing the safety of a ship (including a hovercraft or any similar craft) where the ship was endangered by stress of weather or by navigational hazards; or
- (c)
- dealing with an emergency involving a serious threat to the environment;
or was done with any other reasonable excuse.
HISTORIC SHIPWRECKS ACT 1976
- SECT 17
Discovery of shipwrecks and relics to be notified
- (1)
- A person who finds, in a fixed position in Australian waters or waters above the continental shelf of Australia, the remains of a ship or of a part of a ship, or an article associated with a ship, shall, as soon as practicable, give to the Minister a notice setting out a description of the remains or of the article and a description of the place where the remains are, or the article is, situated, being a description of that place that is sufficient to enable the remains or article to be located.
- (2)
- It is a defence to a prosecution of a person for an offence against subsection (1) if the person proves, or proves that he or she had reasonable grounds for believing, that a notice setting out a description of the place where the remains are or the article is situated, being a description that is sufficient to enable the remains or article to be located, was given to the Minister by another person before it was practicable for the first-mentioned person to give such a notice.
Back to Top
Penalty:
- (a)
- if the offender is a natural person$5,000; or
- (b)
- if the offender is a body corporate$25,000.
HISTORIC SHIPWRECKS ACT 1976
- SECT 18
Rewards
- (1)
- The Minister may:
- (a)
- reward the person who first notifies the Minister in accordance with section 17 of the location of any remains or article:
- (i)
- a description of the location of which, being a description sufficient to enable the remains or article to be located, had not previously been published in Australia; and
- (ii)
- in respect of which a declaration has, since the notification was made, been made under section 5 or which is a Dutch shipwreck or a Dutch relic or which is a historic shipwreck or a historic relic;
- (b)
- offer to reward, and reward the person who first furnishes to the Minister a description of the location of a historic shipwreck, or of a historic relic or historic relics, specified in the offer, being a description sufficient to enable the historic shipwreck or historic relic or historic relics to be located; and
- (c)
- reward any person who furnishes information leading to the conviction of a person for an offence against this Act.
- (2)
- The reward of a person under subsection (1) shall be by way of:
- (a)
- the payment to the person of an amount not exceeding the prescribed amount; or
- (b)
- the giving to the person of a historic relic, plaque, model, replica or medallion;
or both.
- (3)
- Payments by way of reward under this section shall be made out of money appropriated by the Parliament for the purpose of the control of historic shipwrecks.
- (4)
- Articles referred to in paragraph (2)(b) that are required to be purchased by the Commonwealth shall be purchased out of money appropriated by the Parliament for the purpose of the control of historic shipwrecks.
HISTORIC SHIPWRECKS ACT 1976
Part IIIMiscellaneous
HISTORIC SHIPWRECKS ACT 1976
- SECT 19
Arrangements for State and Northern Territory authorities to
perform certain functions
- (1)
- The Governor-General may make arrangements with the Governor of a State or the Administrator of the Northern Territory for the performance of functions by a competent authority of the State or of the Northern Territory in relation to the protection, recovery, preservation and exhibition of historic shipwrecks and historic relics.
- (2)
- Without prejudice to subsection (1), the Governor-General may make arrangements with the Governor of Western Australia for the performance by The Western Australian Museum of functions in relation to the protection, recovery, preservation and exhibition of Dutch shipwrecks and Dutch relics.
HISTORIC SHIPWRECKS ACT 1976
- SECT 20
Declaration as to ownership of remains of ships or
relics
- (1)
- Where the Minister is of the opinion that it is necessary to do so for the purpose of carrying out or giving effect to the Australia-Netherlands Agreement, the Minister may, by notice published in the Gazette, declare the ownership of a specified Dutch shipwreck to be vested in a specified authority of the Commonwealth and, upon the publication of the notice, that authority becomes, by force of this subsection, the owner of that Dutch shipwreck free of any charges or other encumbrances.
- (2)
- Where the Minister is of the opinion that it is necessary to do so for the purpose of carrying out or giving effect to the Australia-Netherlands Agreement, the Minister may, by notice published in the Gazette, declare the ownership of a specified Dutch relic to be vested in a specified authority of the Commonwealth, in the State of Western Australia, in a specified authority of that State or in the Government of the Kingdom of the Netherlands and, upon the publication of the notice, the authority of the Commonwealth, the State of Western Australia, the authority of that State or the Government of the Kingdom of the Netherlands, as the case may be, becomes, by force of this subsection, the owner of that Dutch relic free of any charges or other encumbrances.
- (3)
- Where the Minister is of the opinion that it is necessary to do so for the purpose of carrying out or giving effect to this Act or any relevant agreement other than the Australia-Netherlands Agreement, the Minister may, by notice published in the Gazette, declare the ownership of the remains of a specified ship, or of a specified article that was associated with a ship, or of all articles that were associated with a specified ship, to be vested in the Commonwealth, in a specified State, in a specified authority of the Commonwealth or of a State, in the Government of a specified country other than Australia or in any other specified person and, upon the publication of the notice, the Commonwealth, the State, the authority, the Government, or the other person, as the case may be, becomes, by force of this subsection, the owner of those remains or of that article or those articles, free of any charges or other encumbrances.
- (4)
- The publication of a notice under this section in relation to a Dutch shipwreck, the remains of a ship not being a Dutch shipwreck, a Dutch relic or any other article does not affect the application of any other provision of this Act to or in relation to that Dutch shipwreck, the remains of that ship, that Dutch relic or that other article, as the case may be.
- (5)
- Nothing in this section affects any power of the Commonwealth otherwise than under this Act to dispose of or otherwise deal with any remains of a ship, or any articles, that are the property of the Commonwealth.
Back to Top
HISTORIC SHIPWRECKS ACT 1976
- SECT 21
Compensation
- (1)
- If the operation of this Act or the doing of any act by the Minister in pursuance of this Act results in the acquisition of property from a person, being an acquisition of property within the meaning of paragraph 51(xxxi) of the Constitution, the Commonwealth is liable to pay to that person such compensation as is determined by agreement between the Commonwealth and that person or, in the absence of agreement, by action brought by that person against the Commonwealth in the Supreme Court of a State or Territory.
- (2)
- In determining the compensation payable to a person by the Commonwealth under this section in respect of the acquisition of property from the person, the Court shall have regard to any amount of compensation paid or payable to the person, in respect of the acquisition, by a person other than the Commonwealth.
- (3)
- The Supreme Courts of the States have jurisdiction, and the Supreme Courts of the Territories have jurisdiction to the extent that the Constitution permits, to hear and determine actions brought in those courts under this section.
HISTORIC SHIPWRECKS ACT 1976
- SECT 22
Appointment of inspectors
- (1)
- The Minister may, by writing signed by the Minister, appoint a person to be an inspector for the purposes of this Act.
- (2)
- The Minister shall cause to be issued to each inspector appointed under subsection (1) an identity card in accordance with the prescribed form containing a photograph of the inspector.
- (3)
- A person who ceases to be an inspector appointed under subsection (1) shall forthwith return his or her identity card to the Minister.
Penalty for a contravention of this subsection: $100.
HISTORIC SHIPWRECKS ACT 1976
- SECT 23
Powers of inspectors
- (1)
- Where an inspector has reasonable grounds for believing that it is necessary to do so for the purpose of ascertaining whether an offence against this Act has been or is being committed or that by doing so evidence in relation to the commission of such an offence may be obtained, the inspector may, with or without persons and equipment to assist him or her:
- (a)
- go on board a ship;
- (b)
- require a person in charge of a ship to take steps to facilitate boarding;
- (c)
- open, or require a person to open, any cargo holds, compartments or containers on any ship boarded in accordance with paragraph (a) and inspect the contents of any such cargo holds, compartments or containers;
- (d)
- require any person found in or on any ship boarded in accordance with paragraph (a) to produce any permit in force under this Act that is in the possession of the person; and
- (e)
- require a person to answer questions.
- (2)
- Where an inspector has reason to believe that a person has failed to comply with a notice given to the person under subsection 11(1), the inspector may make application to a Justice of the Peace for a warrant authorizing the inspector, with or without persons and equipment to assist him or her, for the purpose of ascertaining whether the person has failed to comply with the notice:
- (a)
- to enter any specified land or premises; and
- (b)
- to search any land or premises so entered and to break open any cupboard, drawer, desk, box, package or other receptacle, whether a fixture or not, on the land or in the premises.
- (3)
- If, on an application under subsection (2), the Justice of the Peace is satisfied by information on oath or affirmation that the issue of the warrant is reasonably required for the purposes of that subsection, the Justice of the Peace may grant a warrant accordingly.
- (4)
- A warrant under subsection (3) shall specify a date after which the warrant ceases to have effect.
- (5)
- A person must not, without reasonable excuse, fail to comply with a requirement made of the person by an inspector in the exercise of a power under this section.
Back to Top
Penalty: 20 penalty units.
- (5A)
- Paragraph (5)(a) does not apply if the person has a reasonable excuse.
Note: The defendant bears an evidential burden in relation to the matter in subsection (5A). See subsection 13.3(3) of the Criminal Code.
- (6)
- It is a reasonable excuse for a person to fail to answer a question that the person is required to answer under this section that the answer to the question may tend to incriminate the person.
- (7A)
- Paragraph (7)(a) does not apply if the person has a reasonable excuse.
Note: The defendant bears an evidential burden in relation to the matter in subsection (7A). See subsection 13.3(3) of the Criminal Code.
- (8)
- In this section, ship includes a hovercraft and any similar craft.
HISTORIC SHIPWRECKS ACT 1976
- SECT 24
Arrest without warrant
- (1)
- An inspector may, without warrant, arrest a person if the inspector reasonably believes:
- (a)
- that the person has committed an offence against section 13 or against regulations made for the purposes of section 14; and
- (b)
- that proceedings against the person by summons would not be effective.
- (2)
- Where an inspector (other than a member of a police force who is in uniform) arrests a person under subsection (1), the inspector shall:
- (a)
- in the case of an inspector who is a member of a police forceproduce, for inspection by the person arrested, written evidence of the fact that the inspector is a member of a police force; or
- (b)
- in any other caseproduce his or her identity card for inspection by the person arrested.
- (3)
- Where a person is arrested under subsection (1), an inspector shall forthwith bring the person, or cause the person to be brought, before a Justice of the Peace or other proper authority to be dealt with in accordance with law.
- (4)
- Nothing in this section prevents the arrest of a person in accordance with any other law.
HISTORIC SHIPWRECKS ACT 1976
- SECT 25
Seizure and forfeiture
- (1)
- An inspector may seize any ship, equipment or article that the inspector reasonably believes to have been used or otherwise involved in the commission of an offence against this Act and may retain the ship, equipment or article until the expiration of a period of 60 days after the seizure or, if a prosecution for an offence against this Act in the commission of which the ship, equipment or article may have been used or otherwise involved is instituted within that period, until the prosecution is terminated.
- (2)
- The Minister may authorize any ship, equipment or article seized under subsection (1) to be released to its owner, or to the person from whose possession it was seized, either unconditionally or on such conditions as the Minister thinks fit, including conditions as to the giving of security for payment of its value if it is forfeited.
- (3)
- Where a court convicts a person of an offence against this Act, the court may order the forfeiture to the Commonwealth of any ship, equipment or article used or otherwise involved in the commission of the offence.
- (4)
- Any ship, equipment or article forfeited under this section may be sold or otherwise dealt with as the Minister thinks fit.
- (5)
- A reference in this section to an article involved in the commission of an offence includes a reference to any historic shipwreck, or part of a historic shipwreck, or any historic relic, to which the offence relates.
- (6)
- In the section, ship includes a hovercraft and any similar craft.
Back to Top
HISTORIC SHIPWRECKS ACT 1976
- SECT 26
Certain offences indictable
- (1)
- An offence against subsection 11(4) or 13(3) is an indictable offence.
- (2)
- Notwithstanding that an offence referred to in subsection (1) is an indictable offence, a court of summary jurisdiction may hear and determine proceedings in respect of such an offence if the court is satisfied that it is proper to do so and the defendant and the prosecutor consent.
- (3)
- Where, in accordance with subsection (2), a court of summary jurisdiction convicts a person of an offence against subsection 11(4) or 13(3), the penalty that the court may impose is:
- (a)
- if the offender is a natural persona fine not exceeding $2,000 or imprisonment for a period not exceeding 12 months; or
- (b)
- if the offender is a body corporatea fine not exceeding $10,000.
- (4)
- Where the law of a State or Territory makes provision for a person who pleads guilty to a charge in proceedings for the commitment of the person for trial on indictment to be committed to a higher court and dealt with otherwise than on indictment, a person charged in that State or Territory with an offence against this Act may be dealt with in accordance with that law.
HISTORIC SHIPWRECKS ACT 1976
- SECT 27
Jurisdiction of courts
- (1)
- A provision of the Judiciary Act 1903 by which a court of a State is invested with jurisdiction with respect to offences against the laws of the Commonwealth has effect, in relation to offences against this Act not committed within any State, as if that jurisdiction were so invested without limitation as to locality.
- (2)
- The trial on indictment of an offence against this Act not committed within a State may be held by a court of competent jurisdiction at any place where the court may sit.
HISTORIC SHIPWRECKS ACT 1976
- SECT 28
Operation of Act
Subject to the obligations of Australia under international law, including obligations under any agreement between Australia and another country or countries, this Act extends, according to its tenor, to foreigners and to foreign ships (including foreign hovercraft and any similar foreign craft).
HISTORIC SHIPWRECKS ACT 1976
- SECT 29
Certificate by Minister to be evidence
In any proceeding for an offence against this Act, a certificate by the Minister stating that a place specified in the certificate is a place:
- (a)
- in Australian waters;
- (b)
- in Australian waters or waters above the continental shelf of Australia;
- (ba)
- in State waters; or
- (c)
- in a specified protected zone;
is prima facie evidence of the matters stated in the certificate.
HISTORIC SHIPWRECKS ACT 1976
- SECT 30
Delegation
- (1)
- The Minister may, either generally or as otherwise provided by the instrument of delegation, by writing signed by the Minister, delegate to a person any of the powers of the Minister under this Act, other than this power of delegation.
- (2)
- A power so delegated, when exercised by the delegate, shall, for the purposes of this Act, be deemed to have been exercised by the Minister.
- (3)
- A delegation under this section does not prevent the exercise of a power by the Minister.
HISTORIC SHIPWRECKS ACT 1976
- SECT 31
Notices
Back to Top
- (1)
- Without prejudice to any other method of service permitted by law, a notice to a person by the Minister under this Act may be served on the person by being sent by post to the person at the address of the person last known to the Minister.
- (2)
- A notice to the Minister under this Act may be given as prescribed.
- (3)
- A notice by the Minister that has been published in the Gazette in pursuance of this Act may be amended or revoked by the Minister by a further notice published in the Gazette.
HISTORIC SHIPWRECKS ACT 1976
- SECT 32
Regulations
The Governor-General may make regulations, not inconsistent with this Act, prescribing all matters required or permitted by this Act to be prescribed or necessary or convenient to be prescribed for carrying out or giving effect to this Act or carrying out or giving effect to the Australia-Netherlands Agreement or any other relevant agreement.
HISTORIC SHIPWRECKS ACT 1976
Schedules
Schedule 1Agreement between the Netherlands and Australia concerning old Dutch shipwrecks
Section 3
THE UNDERSIGNED:
1. MR WIM BLOKZIJL, resident of The Hague, Head of the Inspection Division of the State Property Directorate of the Ministry of Finance, acting on behalf of the State of the Netherlands, hereinafter referred to as "The Netherlands".
2. DR LLOYD DOUGLAS THOMSON, M.V.O., Australian Ambassador to the Netherlands, acting on behalf of the Government of the Commonwealth of Australia, hereinafter referred to as "Australia":
HAVING REGARD TO THE FACT:
A. That vessels that belonged to the Dutch "VEREENIGDE OOSTINDISCHE COMPAGNIE" known as the V.O.C., hereinafter referred to as "the V.O.C.", were wrecked on or off the coast of Western Australia;
B. That the Netherlands, by virtue of article 247 of the 1798 Constitution of the Batavian Republic, is the present legal successor to the V.O.C.:
AGREE AS FOLLOWS:
Article 1: The Netherlands, as successor to the property and assets of the V.O.C., transfers all its right, title and interest in and to wrecked vessels of the V.O.C. lying on or off the coast of the State of Western Australia and in and to any articles thereof to Australia which shall accept such right, title and interest.
Article 2: For the purpose of this Agreement, the expression "articles" means any part of vessels as referred to in article 1, that have become or have been detached or removed therefrom, as well as the fittings, goods and other property, wherever situated, that were installed or carried on those vessels.
Article 3: Australia shall make no claim on the Netherlands for reimbursement of any costs incurred in searching for any of the vessels referred to in article 1 of this Agreement or in recovering any articles from those vessels.
Article 4: Australia recognizes that the Netherlands has a continuing interest, particularly for historical and other cultural purposes, in articles recovered from any of the vessels referred to in article 1 of this Agreement.
Accordingly Australia shall set up a Committee to determine the disposition and subsequent ownership of the recovered articles between the Netherlands, Australia and the State of Western Australia.
Article 5: The Committee referred to in article 4 of this Agreement shall be set up within 90 days after the entry into force of the Agreement and shall comprise two persons nominated by the Netherlands and two persons nominated by Australia. These persons shall have the scientific and cultural expertise appropriate for the discharge of their functions.
Article 6: The Committee shall determine the disposition of the recovered articles in accordance with the principles which have been agreed upon by Australia and the Netherlands and are set out in the Arrangement signed by Australia and the Netherlands and attached to this document.
Article 7: Expenditure incurred by the Committee in the performance of its work shall be shared between the two Parties represented on the Committee, the share to be borne by the Netherlands being one third and that by Australia two thirds provided that
- (I)
- each Party shall bear the costs of travel by the Committee members nominated by it,
- (II)
- the costs of communications by a party to the Committee shall be borne by the despatching Party, and
- (III)
- the expenses of transportation of articles distributed in accordance with determinations of the Committee shall be borne by the recipients of the articles.
Back to Top
Article 8: If the members of the Committee referred to in article 4 of this Agreement cannot come to an agreement on the disposition of particular articles, Australia and the Netherlands shall appoint an independent consultant to report on the matter in issue and the report shall be referred to the Committee for re-consideration of the matter. The cost of the report shall be shared between the two Parties represented on the Committee, the share to be borne by the Netherlands being one third and that by Australia two thirds.
Article 9: If, on considering the consultant's report on a matter, the members of the Committee cannot come to an agreement on the disposition of the recovered articles, the matter will be referred to the Government of the Kingdom of the Netherlands and the Government of the Commonwealth of Australia, which will settle the matter by negotiation.
Article 10: This Agreement shall enter into force on the date of the signatures of both Parties.
DONE at The Hague this sixth day of November in the year One thousand nine hundred and seventy-two in two originals in the English language.
ARRANGEMENT SETTING OUT THE GUIDING PRINCIPLES FOR THE COMMITTEE TO DETERMINE THE DISPOSITION OF MATERIAL FROM THE SHIPWRECKS OF DUTCH EAST INDIA COMPANY VESSELS OFF THE COAST OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA
THE COMMITTEE
Responsibility
The Committee's responsibility will embrace all material recovered from the wreckswhether recovered before or after the coming into operation of the Western Australian Museum Act in December 1964 which contains provisions for vesting in the Museum title to the wrecks of the Batavia, the Gilt Dragon, the Zuytdorp and Zeewyk.
Conduct of Business
The Committee is small enough to meet if occasion demands but most of its work could be done by correspondence.
General Principles
Representative collections
The cost of recovery (including treatment) is likely to exceed by far the intrinsic or antiquarian sale-value of material recovered. The Government of Western Australia is spending considerable sums on this work ($92,000 in the last financial year) and estimates that the total cost will be $2,000,000 or more. Although a division would not be warranted by consideration of cash value alone, the historic, educational, scientific and international considerations are such as to make the deposition of representative collections in the museums of the Netherlands and Australia most desirable. The remainder of the material would be held in the Western Australian Museum.
Considerations governing the partition of archaeological collections
In modern archaeological practice sites are no longer regarded merely as a source of important individual items, but rather as a body of material whose collective value far outweighs the importance of the individual pieces and in which the relationship of the individual objects within the sample are a major part of its historical value. Accordingly, the sharing of material from an archaeological site is best regarded as the accommodation in several localities of a corporate entity rather than its division into parts.
If the decision is made that the contents of an archaeological site are to be apportioned between two or more institutions, the first principle to be observed is that the total assemblage should be capable of reassembly to allow further statistical and scholarly analysis. It follows, therefore, that unnecessary splitting of a sample of closely similar objects capable of statistical treatment should be avoided and, where samples are accommodated in more than one institution, those institutions should contract not to disperse them further and, moreover, to agree to allow samples to be brought together for analysis and study as required. The second principle is that where unique or rare objects, themselves, form a meaningful assemblage within the whole, this assemblage should not be split or, if split, perfect replicas be made to complete the assemblage. As in the case of the division of statistical samples an agreement should be made between the recipients to reconstitute the original assemblage if it is required for scholarly research.
Treatment of material recovered
The contents of the ancient shipwrecks of the Dutch East India Company include abundant statistical samples such as coin, bricks, objects of pottery, elephant tusks, and so on. There are also many articles which are less abundant but which are duplicated many times over. Many of these are ship fittings such as cannon, anchors, cannon balls, etc. There are also other articles which are relatively rare, or even unique, in the deposits (e.g. articles possessed by crew members, or passengers, such as barber's instruments, navigational instruments, ornaments, etc.). Most articles are fragmentary and in need of immediate chemical conservation and stabilization in the laboratory as soon as they are recovered. This treatment cannot await distribution.
Operating Principles
Code of Operation
The Committee will operate by reviewing proposals for distribution made, from time to time, by the Director of the Western Australian Museum; it could decide that the proposed samples be increased or decreased in content in the light of the total material collected and other factors.
General aims
Back to Top
In its deliberations the Committee will have, as its general aim, the purpose of ensuring that representative series of statistical samples and sufficient examples of the rarer objects will be deposited in the museums of the Netherlands and Australia to convey the variety and contents of each wreck to both the public and to scholars while, at the same time, ensuring that major projects of scholarly research will not be impeded by overfragmentation of the collection. Dispersal in this way, among separate repositories will also help to ensure the permanent safety of representative material in the event of the destruction of any one repository.
Statistical samples
Most material so far recovered from the vessels are samples capable of statistical treatment.
A representative collection of the contents of each statistical sample should be made available to a museum of the Netherlands Government and a museum of the Commonwealth Government. Thus, in the case of coin, for example, both the Netherlands and Commonwealth Governments would receive as complete a series as possible representing the mintings and values contained within each of the wrecks. These will provide their museums with ample material of this class of objects for display purposes and sufficient to enable a scholar to make the initial qualitative studies which would possibly lead him to a more detailed statistical treatment of the bulk sample retained in the Western Australian Museum.
Less common or rare objects
In order to ensure that both the Netherlands and Commonwealth Governments acquire, in due course, representative collections of the less common and even unique objects, the following procedure will be adopted. Since the relationships of such objects to the whole sample cannot be known until excavation is complete, the distribution of specimens of this nature cannot be considered during the continuing process of recovery. However, at reasonable intervals (of say two or three years) it should be possible to assemble a representative sample with fair certainty that all duplicates of any rare object present in a particular excavation should have been recovered and their nature taken into consideration during the deliberations of the Committee.
THE HAGUE,
6th November, 1972 HISTORIC SHIPWRECKS ACT 1976
Schedule 2Dutch shipwrecks off the coast of Western Australia
Section 3
Name by which Vessel was known
| Approximate location
|
"Batavia"
| Beacon Island, Wallabi Group, Houtmans Abrolhos
|
"Vergulde Draeck" or "Gilt Dragon"
| Ledge Point
|
"Zuytdorp"
| 40 miles north of the mouth of the Murchison River
|
"Zeewyk"
| Gun Island, Pelsart Group, Houtmans Abrolhos
|
Back to Top
HISTORIC SHIPWRECKS ACT 1976
Notes to the Historic Shipwrecks Act 1976
Note 1
The Historic Shipwrecks Act 1976 as shown in this compilation comprises Act No. 190, 1976 amended as indicated in the Tables below.
All relevant information pertaining to application, saving or transitional provisions prior to 24 November 2000 is not included in this compilation. For subsequent information see Table A.
Table of Acts
Act
| Number and year
| Date of Assent
| Date of commencement
| Application, saving or transitional provisions
|
Historic Shipwrecks Act 1976
| 190, 1976
| 15 Dec 1976
| 15 Dec 1976
|
|
Jurisdiction of Courts (Miscellaneous Amendments) Act 1979
| 19, 1979
| 28 Mar 1979
| Parts II-XVII (ss. 3-123): 15 May 1979 (see Gazette 1979, No. S86) Remainder: Royal Assent
| S. 124
|
Historic Shipwrecks Amendment Act 1980
| 88, 1980
| 29 May 1980
| 29 May 1980
| S. 6(2)
|
Statute Law Revision Act 1981
| 61, 1981
| 12 June 1981
| Part XIII (ss. 56, 57): 19 June 1981 (a)
|
|
Torres Strait Treaty (Miscellaneous Amendments) Act 1984
| 22, 1984
| 26 Apr 1984
| Part X (ss. 29, 30): 15 Feb 1985 (see s. 2(2) and Gazette 1985, No. S38) Remainder: 15 Feb 1985 (see s. 2(1) and Gazette 1985, No. S38)
|
|
Statute Law (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act (No. 1) 1985
| 65, 1985
| 5 June 1985
| S. 3: 3 July 1985 (b)
|
|
as amended by
|
|
|
|
|
Statute Law (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act (No. 2) 1985
| 193, 1985
| 16 Dec 1985
| S. 3: 3 July 1985 (c)
| S. 16
|
Criminal Code Amendment (Theft, Fraud, Bribery and Related Offences) Act 2000
| 137, 2000
| 24 Nov 2000
| Ss. 1-3 and Schedule 1 (items 1, 4, 6, 7, 9-11, 32): Royal Assent Remainder: 24 May 2001
| Sch. 2 (items 418, 419) [see Table A]
|
Environment and Heritage Legislation Amendment (Application of Criminal Code) Act 2001
| 15, 2001
| 22 Mar 2001
| S. 4 and Schedule 1 (items 96-103): 24 May 2001 (d)
| S. 4 [see Table A]
|
Back to Top
(a) The Historic Shipwrecks Act 1976 was amended by Part XIII (sections 56 and 57) only of the Statute Law Revision Act 1981, subsection 2(6) of which provides as follows:
(6) Part XIII shall come into operation, or shall be deemed to have come into operation, as the case requires, on the day after the day on which Part II of the Petroleum (Submerged LandsMiscellaneous Amendments) Act 1981 comes or came into operation.
(b) The Historic Shipwrecks Act 1976 was amended by section 3 only of the Statute Law (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act (No. 1) 1985, subsection 2(1) of which provides as follows:
(1) Subject to this section, this Act shall come into operation on the twenty-eighth day after the day on which it receives the Royal Assent.
(c) The Statute Law (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act (No. 1) 1985 was amended by section 3 only of the Statute Law (Miscellaneous Provisions) (No. 2) Act 1985, subsection 2(15)(b) of which provides as follows:
(b) in the case of the other amendmentson the twenty-eighth day after the day on which that Act received the Royal Assent.
(d) The Historic Shipwrecks Act 1976 was amended by Schedule 1 (items 96-103) only of the Environment and Heritage Legislation Amendment (Application of Criminal Code) Act 2001, subsection 2(1)(c) of which provides as follows:
(1) Subject to this section, this Act commences on the latest of the following days:
(c) the day on which item 15 of Schedule 1 to the Criminal Code Amendment (Theft, Fraud, Bribery and Related Offences) Act 2000 commences.
Table of Amendments
ad. = added or inserted am. = amended rep. = repealed rs. = repealed and substituted
|
Provision affected
| How affected
|
Preamble
| am. No. 88, 1980
|
S. 2
| am. No. 88, 1980; No. 22, 1984; No. 65, 1985
|
S. 3
| am. No. 88, 1980; No. 61, 1981; No. 22, 1984; No. 65, 1985; No. 15, 2001
|
Ss. 3A, 3B
| ad. No. 65, 1985
|
S.4
| rs. No. 65, 1985
|
S. 4AA
| ad. No. 15, 2001
|
S. 4A
| ad. No. 65, 1985
|
S. 5
| am. No. 22, 1984; No. 65, 1985
|
Ss. 6-9
| am. No. 65, 1985
|
S. 10
| am. No. 65, 1985; No. 137, 2000
|
Ss. 11, 12
| am. No. 65, 1985
|
S. 13
| am. No. 65, 1985; No. 15, 2001
|
S. 15
| am. No. 65, 1985; No. 15, 2001
|
S. 16
| am. No. 88, 1980
|
S. 17
| am. No. 65, 1985; No. 137, 2000
|
S. 18
| am. No. 65, 1985
|
S. 19
| am. No. 88, 1980
|
S. 20
| am. No. 65, 1985
|
S. 21
| am. No. 19, 1979
|
S. 22
| am. No. 65, 1985
|
S. 23
| am. No. 65, 1985 (as am. by No. 193, 1985); No. 137, 2000; No. 15, 2001
|
Ss. 24, 25
| am. No. 65, 1985
|
S. 26
| rs. No. 65, 1985
|
| am. No. 137, 2000
|
Ss. 29, 30
| am. No. 65, 1985
|
Table A
Application, saving or transitional provisions
Criminal Code Amendment (Theft, Fraud, Bribery and Related Offences) Act 2000 (No. 137, 2000)
Schedule 2
418 Transitionalpre-commencement offences
(1) Despite the amendment or repeal of a provision by this Schedule, that provision continues to apply, after the commencement of this item, in relation to:
- (a)
- an offence committed before the commencement of this item; or
- (b)
- proceedings for an offence alleged to have been committed before the commencement of this item; or
- (c)
- any matter connected with, or arising out of, such proceedings;
as if the amendment or repeal had not been made.
(2) Subitem (1) does not limit the operation of section 8 of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901.
419 Transitionalpre-commencement notices
If:
- (a)
- a provision in force immediately before the commencement of this item required that a notice set out the effect of one or more other provisions; and
- (b)
- any or all of those other provisions are repealed by this Schedule; and
- (c)
- the first-mentioned provision is amended by this Schedule;
the amendment of the first-mentioned provision by this Schedule does not affect the validity of such a notice that was given before the commencement of this item.
Environment and Heritage Legislation Amendment (Application of Criminal Code) Act 2001 (No. 15, 2001)
4 Application of amendments
- (1)
- Each amendment made by this Act applies to acts and omissions that take place after the amendment commences.
- (2)
- For the purposes of this section, if an act or omission is alleged to have taken place between 2 dates, one before and one on or after the day on which a particular amendment commences, the act or omission is alleged to have taken place before the amendment commences.