Federal Register of Legislation - Australian Government

Primary content

Judiciary Act 1912

Authoritative Version
  • - C1912A00031
  • No longer in force
Act No. 31 of 1912 as made
An Act to amend the Judiciary Act 1903-1910.
Date of Assent 24 Dec 1912
Date of repeal 24 Jun 2014
Repealed by Amending Acts 1901 to 1969 Repeal Act 2014



No. 31 of 1912.

An Act to amend the Judiciary Act 1903–1910.

[Assented to 24th December, 1912.]

BE it enacted by the King’s Most Excellent Majesty, the Senate, and the House of Representatives of the Commonwealth of Australia, as follows:—

Short title and citation.

1.—(1.)  This Act may be cited as the Judiciary Act 1912.

(2.)  The Judiciary Act 1903–1910 is in this Act referred to as the Principal Act.

(3.)  The Principal Act, as amended by this Act, may be cited as the Judiciary Act 1903–1912.

Number of Justices.

2.  Section four of the Principal Act is amended by omitting the word “four” and inserting in its stead the word “six.”

3.  Section twenty-three of the Principal Act is repealed, and the following section inserted in its stead:—

Decision of majority in case of difference of opinion.

 “23.—(1.)            A Full Court consisting of less than all the Justices shall not give a decision on a question affecting the constitutional powers of the Commonwealth, unless a majority of all the Justices concur in the decision.

(2.)  Subject to the last preceding sub-section, when the Justices sitting as a Full Court are divided in opinion as to the decision to be given on any question, the question shall be decided according to the decision of the majority, if there is a majority; but if the Court is equally divided in opinion,—

(a) in the case where a decision of a Justice of the High Court (whether acting as a Justice of the High Court or in some other capacity), or of a Supreme Court of a State or a Judge thereof, is called in question by appeal or otherwise, the decision appealed from shall be affirmed; and

(b) in any other case, the opinion of the Chief Justice, or if he is absent the opinion of the Senior Justice present, shall prevail.”